Ten days after he indicated in a public forum that he thinks Israel is an apartheid state and a liability for the United States, and despite being called on it by PJMedia, Dinesh D’Souza hasn’t said an additional word about it—in public or on his blog.
“With a large college audience, and facing an open Israel hater and supporter of the BDS movement in [unrepentent terrorist] Bill Ayers—who of course agreed with the questioner, and condemned Israel as an apartheid State–D’Souza had a great opportunity to explain why morality compels one to support the state of Israel. D’Souza had a great opportunity to push back against the atrocious lie that Israel is an apartheid state, similar to racist South Africa. He did not do that.”
I take his silence to mean that he meant what he indicated, that he also believes Israel is an apartheid state and a liability to the U.S. He’s welcome to his opinion, of course, as I am welcome to mine and I’ve removed the link to his blog from my blogroll and will stop promoting him in any way.
THE TEXAS SCRIBBLER 
Morality’s ass. Morality is no reason to support Israel. I support the country and its people for what they are, i.e., the only decent government in northern Africa. We, the USA, need Israel.
Without getting into the Biblical/religious aspects, at all.
Oh well, it looks like this is becoming a fashion lately.
At least they didn’t go after the Boy Scouts this time.
Thanks for the comment, Les. The Boy Scouts capitulated. They were, I suppose, in the “wrong,” for not admitting homosexuals, having already changed in other ways to be more “modern.” Israel is not a racist state by any objective measurement.