Cartoonist Scott Adams, creator of Dilbert:
“Historians: Objectively speaking, is Biden the most prolific liar the Democrats have ever nominated to represent their party? That is a serious question. I think he’s setting records.”
Well, he repeats the “fine people” hoax over and over again.
UPDATE: Adams: “Biden’s spreading of the Fine People Hoax creates a real health risk for Trump supporters because his supporters believe it to be true. Twitter could protect the public by labeling tweets with that hoax as false. @jack”
Asking censor Twitter for a real, public service? Good luck with that.
Truly, the Left can’t control our president, as Tucker demonstrates, and it remains to be seen if they can beat him in November, but meanwhile, what a wasteland, as someone once called broadcast television. Is cable worse? Can these whiners be eased out for ones more objective or are we doomed to see the invective spread? Meanwhile, we have The Donald.
Why did they pick a mail-in-fraud Trump tweet for their first “fact check” of the president? Could it be their investment in outfits that push mail-in ballots?
Via Breitbart News Syndicate
Voldemort? Nah. Eric Ciaramella, the Dim’s so-called whistleblower in their kangaroo court impeachment inquiry. Facebook is hiding the name, along with the Mediacrats and the Dims, of course. Demanding secrecy, all.
Comes now the first Congress Critter to speak the name in public. U.S. Rep Dan Bishop, R-North Carolina, tweeted “He’s not Voldemort. And he’s not a bona fide whistleblower. Even if he were he would not be entitled to secrecy. Eric Ciaramella is a deep state conspirator. He needs to testify now.”
He would be called to testify in any Senate impeachment trial, which is why there probably won’t be one, as PJMedia’s Charlie Martin writes, “Where what already looks like a shady investigation of a made-up crime can’t be controlled…an actual impeachment trial? They can’t risk it.”
Via PJMedia & Breitbart News
A darling of Austin’s Dimocrat daily is Dim presidential candidate Julian Castro, or maybe he should be renamed Fidel after his brother U.S. Rep Joaquin Castro’s doxxing of 44 San Antonio donors to President Trump’s re-election campaign.
Tweeting their names and occupations under the guise of revealing “haters” is sure to bring them trouble. Dimocrats like Joaquin are the real haters.
UPDATE: Joaquin, who is Julian’s campaign manager, catches it from all sides, including
one two of the donors who also gave money to him. Julian’s campaign, already underwater, is drowning.
MORE: One doxxed woman donor is receiving threatening voicemails. Time to lawyer up Joaquin!
Even diehard Dimocrat Mrs Charm admitted that Nancy Pelosi (or Crazy Nancy as Trump sometimes calls her) was a poor choice to be the first woman speaker of the House.
Called out by a male GOP rep, Doug Collins of Georgia, the other day for breaking the House rules (specifically the specific rule against calling the president a racist), she stalked off the dais, silenced by another House rule, until the majority Dims voted her back in.
“The vote on the motion to strike Pelosi’s remarks failed in a 190-232 vote with no Democratic support. Every Republican voted in favor of the motion.”
Over in the Senate, Cocaine Mitch McConnell, the Republican majority leader, said simply: “The president’s not a racist.”
Hijinks, congressional-style, begun and ended by Crazy Nancy, the first woman speaker of the House of Representatives.
Via The Hill, Twitchy, and Politico
Stephen Green (co-Instapundit) at PJMedia:
“Trump’s tweets have always been tailored to generate a gut response. The trick — and I admit it took me months longer than it should have to take this to heart — is to allow yourself a brief cooling down period, consider his target audience and their gut response. Instead of luxuriating in an outraged #Resist or a chest-thumping #MAGA insta-reaction, ask yourself what was the purpose of Trump’s tweet, and did he achieve it. Do that, and you’ll find that while Trump takes a lot of flak for his tweets, it’s almost always because he’s directly over his target…The man practically tweeted himself into the most powerful position in the world, and his seemingly ill-measured tweets deserve a more measured response…”
ADDENDUM: From the Instapundit his ownself: “Trump is pointing out that these “it” girls are ungrateful asses who don’t like America. By not naming them, he’s forcing their defenders, and his critics, to admit that they’re ungrateful asses who don’t like America before they can even talk about the issue. This isn’t hard. But if you want more, there’s this way of putting it: All the Democrats have to do is not be crazy, and Trump’s making it impossible for them to do that.”