Category Archives: Iraq

Deep in the heart

Strategy Page reports on a potentially disturbing development:

"The heavy equipment for the troops at Ft Hood moves by rail to Houston and Beaumont, where they are loaded on ships for movement overseas. The tracks cross numerous little gullies and creeks. For the most part the viaducts across these obstacles are made of creosote-treated wood. And there’s absolutely no security. In one night a half dozen guys with some trucks and matches could do enough damage to hold up the movement, of half a dozen brigades (III Corps), for weeks."

Let’s hope someone is doing something about this. Alerting the sheriffs in the affected counties would be a good start. 

Go big? Just like Vietnam

It’s hard to tell if the pundits know anything or if they’re just misunderestimating Bush, as usual. Heck, most of them predicted he would hop up on James Baker’s hobby horse and ride off to Tehran and Damascus to plead for help. So is there any real evidence that he wants to throw more troops at the problems in Iraq, like many of them are saying now? Hope not. It might just be Vietnam all over again, the way the anti-wars believe it already is. American troops all over the place, the Iraqi troops (read South Vietnamese army) sitting on their hands watching the Americans chew up neighborhoods, lots more American and civilian casualties. And, in the end, when the troops go home, nothing much to show for it as the insurgents surge back in. So I’m keeping my fingers crossed that the pundits, including irascible Ralph Peters, really don’t know what they’re talking about.

Peters, in particular, seems to have lost his way lately. He still gets a lot of respect from retired military careerist friends of mine, but sometimes he just doesn’t make any sense. He’s for Go big, but only if the rules of engagement change: ignore the MSM, shoot to kill, disarm the population, swarm the streets of Baghdad. Fat chance. The World War II days of saturation bombing are long gone. Do it precisely, directed by 30,000 or so advisers on the ground embeded with the Iraqi army, or forget about it. And start by killing Mookie Sadr, or at least ship him to Guantanamo. My two cents. The great thing about blogs is I get to spend mine. So do you if you care to comment. Just keep it civil.

UPDATE  Blogger Bill Roggio, embeded with Marine advisers to the Iraqi Army is reporting stuff I haven’t seen anywhere else. Some of it is good: the Iraqi troops are brave and resourceful and tactically profficient. All they really need advisors for is help with resupply, and heavy weapons. Presumably also medevac, although it isn’t mentioned. The bad stuff sounds a lot like the worst of the South Vietnamese army’s problems. The Iraqi government is so inept (or corrupt) that their troops can’t get rifles, helmets or body armor, not even their own pay! Surely we can do better for them. While you’re at Roggio’s place, hit his tip jar. He’s already doing more than the MSM has. 

Army stronger, please

Could this be why Rumsfeld’s resignation was accepted? Chief of Staff Gen. Peter J. Schoomaker’s recent passionate testimony to Congress, once reportedly accompanied by banging his hand on the witness table,  included a plea for more troops, and an end to restrictions on the use of the reserves and guard.

"’I recommend we continue to grow the Army so that we have choices,’ Schoomaker said, cautioning that it is ill advised to assume demand for American troops overseas will decrease. ‘Our history is replete with examples where we have guessed wrong: 1941, 1950, 2001, to name a few,’ he said. ‘We don’t know what’s ahead.’"

Maj. Megan McClung Memorial Video

Moving tribute to highest ranking American female warrior, a Marine, killed in Iraq. Worth your time.

Via Third Army video and photo system. 

Fixes and folly

The two best ideas of the Iraq Study Group’s 79 recommendations are being implemented, according to Bing West, a Vietnam veteran and former assistant secretary of defense in the Reagan administration. Namely, vastly increasing the number of American advisers with the Iraqi army (which CENTCOM press releases said before the report was released was already underway), and turning that army over to the new Iraqi government by late spring. The latter because former CENTCOM commander Gen. John P. Abizaid has told Congress that Iraqi PM Maliki will, by February, take care of the main threat of civil war, Mookie Sadr and his murderous militia.

Meanwhile, the most ridiculous ideas, it is generally agreed, are the ones about negotiating with the dictators of Iran and Syria to help stabilize the situation–as if they wanted the first successful Arab democracy on their borders. So, naturally, that is what Sen. Kerry has set out to do. He is flaunting federal law and White House policy to go visit Baby Assad in Damascus to chat it up. Not too surprising, since Kerry flaunted federal law and Nixon White House policy in the early 1970s to go to Paris to meet with the North Vietnamese.

The scuttlebutt is that the Paris trip cost Kerry, who was still a Navy reserve officer, a dishonorable discharge, which President Carter later fixed. But we can’t be sure until Big John releases his military records, which he has consistently refused to do. At least he’s no longer in the military, so he hasn’t that part to worry about. And, so far at least, he doesn’t plan to go to Iran.

Bad pennies, etc.

They do, in fact, always turn up. Eason Jordan, for instance, the disgraced former president of CNN (known to American veterans as the Communist News Network) has a new Internet news site focusing entirely on Iraq. Which is odd (or appropriate, perhaps) considering he was best known for sucking up to Saddam before the 2004 liberation. Until, that is, he asserted at several foreign venues that the American military was purposely targeting journalists for death. Something tells me his new venture will not be far afield of his old employer and may even come to rival al Jiz for mendacity. But we shall see.

James Baker, cynic

There’s been lots of banter in the blogosphere on the Iraq Study Group’s amazingly convoluted recommendations, much of it glossing over co-director James Baker’s longstanding financial and other ties to Saudi Arabia, but noting that out of all the proposed Middle Eastern conferences and diplomacy, the one country left out entirely is Israel. While making the Golan Heights a bargaining chip for Iraqi peace.

Some say that was predictable, given Baker’s reputed remark to Bush senior years ago to "F…the Jews, they didn’t vote for us anyway," since few of them are Republicans. But Baker, of Houston, has been known in Texas for cynicism ever since he ran for attorney general back in the 1980s. His television ads featured him slamming a cell door while talking about locking up criminals and throwing away the key. He didn’t invent the imagery or the slogan, he just mined it for all it was worth. What he knew, and what he also knew at least some of the electorate didn’t know, was that the Texas AG handles only civil cases. Not criminal ones. Forturnately for Texans, he lost.