In favor:
“…the lack of a ground invasion empowers our enemies, diminishes our sovereignty, and will, in the long run, cost Israel more money, terrorist attacks and blood.”
Opposed:
“A tank has no advantages in urban areas as it has limited maneuverability, cannot aim at upper floors and is a slow-moving, easily hit target…Soldiers…are sitting ducks for snipers. Hamas has laid mines, built tunnels underneath the houses, fortified sniper positions in strategically placed buildings.”
Gaza is a rat’s nest. IDF casualties could be high. But bombs are slow and, eventually, will have to be replaced by one of the campaign’s chief critics. Which may not be willing to cooperate.
Which move would you favor?
Via Arutz Sheva
UPDATE: The die is cast, the ground invasion has begun. After Hamas broke the so-called truce.
THE TEXAS SCRIBBLER 