I see I’m not the only one who dislikes the new Sitemeter. It’s much harder to figure out than the old version, which I was used to digesting at a glance. No more.
UPDATE: Apparently overwhelmed with unhappy customers, they "rolled back" to the original. Yes!
THE TEXAS SCRIBBLER 
I am in a state of shock for the last few hours.
I am in a state of shock for the last few hours.
It looks like it was designed by a committee.
It looks like it was designed by a committee.
I guess it was a trial balloon. They’re not defending it. Instead, they’re “rolling back to the previous system.”
I guess it was a trial balloon. They’re not defending it. Instead, they’re “rolling back to the previous system.”
I guess it was a trial balloon. They’re not defending it. Instead, they’re “rolling back to the previous system.”
Excellent news, that roll back. Now to chase down the $6.95 I paid for their new “premium” service.
Excellent news, that roll back. Now to chase down the $6.95 I paid for their new “premium” service.
Excellent news, that roll back. Now to chase down the $6.95 I paid for their new “premium” service.
Otherwise known as the old “premium” service, which I started taking in 1999. (The main difference with the new one, other than the godawful new interface, and good riddance to it, was that the price was no longer keyed to the number of hits you got.)
Otherwise known as the old “premium” service, which I started taking in 1999. (The main difference with the new one, other than the godawful new interface, and good riddance to it, was that the price was no longer keyed to the number of hits you got.)
Yes, I’ve been paying $6.95 for the “old” premium service since last year. But I had no idea it was keyed to the number of hits.