Warming lies continue in face of cooling

“…temperatures have stopped warming in all the data bases going back as far as 1997. All are showing a cooling since 2002 even as CO2 continues to rise.”

So reminds Weather Bell meterologist Joe D’Aleo, as he dissects the Weather Channel’s and NBC’s determination to continue propagandizing global warming in the face of polls showing fewer and fewer Americans believe in it. As well they shouldn’t.

Meanwhile, it’s coming clear that those climate models the “scientist” hoaxers have relied on to forecast future doom for the planet are failing to accurately predict five years into the future, never mind a century.

I still wonder if we aren’t in danger of an imminent Ice Age, re scifi author Larry Niven’s Fallen Angels, now that the Greens he imagined forcing huge reductions in CO2 (bringing on the Glaciers moving south) are actually in power. And their servant Wormtongue is flirting with our economic disaster in his zeal to reduce CO2.

But I’m probably just infected with the gloom-and-doom we’re all been hammered with for the last decade. Pols need distractions to facilitate their ongoing thefts and bribes and this end-of-the-world stuff works nicely.

UPDATE: The hoaxers and their media cronies have the proof! Proof, they tell you. That’s because they’ve manipulated the numbers, cooling the past, so they can keep claiming “this year” is the hottest ever, etc.

4 responses to “Warming lies continue in face of cooling

  1. If I were to choose between warming and cooling, I would go for warming any time. I think. So you say a new ice age?

  2. Dick Stanley's avatar Dick Stanley

    Neither would be very good for any of us. With excessive warming, you die of drought. With cooling, if it goes as far as a new ice age, we’d all be scraped off the earth by sliding glaciers. I’ve always thought it was mostly political bull, of a type which appeals to some people who enjoy being frightened. The pols, of course, find ways to profit from it, as do the so-called scientists who do the government’s propaganda work, when they aren’t fudging the numbers.

  3. What? What? A Larry Niven that I haven’t read?

    Gotta remedy that ASAP.