Category Archives: Afghanistan

The peasant’s gun

The AK-47 assualt rifle celebrated its 60th birthday Friday, and Lt Col P at Op-For notes the fact, while dissing the technology. Reliable? Check. Simple? The same. Accurate? Not hardly. But, then, on full auto, hosing the opposition, who could tell? And that’s what peasants do. They ain’t target shooters.

Winning hearts and minds

This is one of the most balanced reports I’ve seen from the BBC, and it’s a reasonable take on the continuing problems of the Afghanistan campaign.

“If ye break faith with us who die…”

Memorial Day is supposed to be about honoring the war dead, and passing the torch. It’s not supposed to be just another chance to whack Bush over Iraq, while leaving Afghanistan unmentioned because you can’t use that favored MSM phrase "…this unpopular war" with Afghanistan. The Memorial Day observance, which began in and after the American Civil War, is supposed to about the war dead, not the living combatants nor veterans. And not breaking faith is, today, an often forgotten part of it.

Support for milblogs

President Bush addressed the Milblog Conference, here, but Badger 6 notes the new regulation suggesting frontline Army blogging may be imperiled, still stands.

Why we fight

The Dem presidential candidates and party and congressional leadership prove their unseriousness on the Long War every time they say Afghanistan is where it’s at, not oil-rich and influential Iraq–as Charles Krauthammer so ably demonstrates:

"…you do not decide where to fight on the basis of history; you decide on the basis of strategic realities of the ground. You can argue about our role in creating this new front and question whether it was worth taking that risk in order to topple Saddam Hussein. But you cannot reasonably argue that in 2007 Iraq is not the most critical strategic front in the war on terror."

Worth a read.

Information war surrender

Strange, really, how the U.S. military capitulates when it comes to trying to influence the media war. I guess they expect to lose with the MSM and so they refuse to try to win. But that’s really pretty stupid. It may please them to, as Michael Yon notes, decline to set up press centers for the benefit of reporters who need reliable Internet and satellite connections, but they are cutting off their own noses.

"Billions of dollars are spent on the war each month, millions of dollars fly around here like sparrows, yet there are no designated places for journalists? While so many soldiers and their families shout for coverage from Afghanistan (remember that place?) and Iraq, I can sometimes be found from midnight to sunrise sitting outside, trying to transmit photos through a wireless network that only works sometimes."

Much is being made in the blogosphere of Gen. Vincent K. Brooks’ apparent threat to kick Yon out of Iraq. I suspect that has less to do with what he writes than his attitude combined with his former status as an NCO trigger-puller. But he also doesn’t fail to paint pictures of the ubiquitous PX with its incongruous multitude of flat-screen TVs, and the steak-and-lobster, cake-and-cookie mess halls which the brass cannot fail to dislike having publicized. It’s supposed to be all about guns-and-glory, not how many discounted components you can buy for your stereo or camera. As Yon’s reporting illustrates, it’s really about both. And it isn’t new. It was like that in Viet Nam, too. But at least there the military tried, and sometimes successfully did, influence MSM coverage.

Information war

Typical one-sided view of the international (it’s-all-about-us-all-the-time) news media, this time on some soldiers’ deletion of a journalists’ digital photos of unfortunate collateral death in Afghanistan:

"’Why did the soldiers do it if they don’t have anything to hide?’ said Jean-Francois Julliard, a spokesman for the Paris-based group."

Maybe they’re tired of what you hide, Jean-Francois.