Category Archives: Library

Wearing the Cinco Peso

I came away from independent historian Mike Cox’s The Texas Rangers, Wearing The Cinco Peso, 1821-1900 with a new view of the fabled outfit, the samurai of early Texas, you might say. There’s less of their invincibility here than vulnerability. Despite committing occasional injustices, they seem often to have been short of manpower, money and even modern weapons yet would charge into a fight they couldn’t reasonably win and only after taking as well as inflicting casualties, withdraw. They usually were effective, but they paid a high price.

I can’t find the link but one newspaper reviewer complained the book is too bloody. It is graphic in describing the appalling things the Commanche and other maurauding Indians liked to do to settler families, but no more so, I don’t think, than some recent historical fiction. More so, however, than professional historian Walter Prescott Webb’s 1935 classic that Cox has updated with thorough documentation. Webb, for instance, says on page 313 only that Ranger D.W.H. Bailey was slain in July, 1874, trying to get water for a thirsting company under Indian siege. Cox tells us that Bailey’s name was Dave and quotes a comrade that the Indians killed him in sight of the others by cutting off his nose, ears, hands, arms, etc. and eating his flesh until their leader dispatched him with a tomahawk. It helps you understand why the early Rangers tended to shoot Indians on sight. When the savages finally were subdued, there were still Anglo and Mexican murderers and border bandits to fight and the Rangers kept charging, and sometimes losing, but were always ready to charge again.

The only thing I found disconcerting was the author’s continual mockery of the spelling and grammar of old letter-writers and memoirists. Any reader of nineteenth century material knows that spelling and punctuation were ad-hoc, and only the arrival of mass public education standardized them. Cox is finishing a second volume to bring the Rangers up to the 21st century, something Webb didn’t live to do, and it should make a dandy story, or rather series of stories, which is the way this first volume is put together. Rangers are mainly detectives, nowadays, but their mystique lives on in their holstered but cocked .45s. I’ll look forward to No. 2 and, meanwhile, recommend this one to anyone interested in Texas history. As my Corsicana grandfather used to say, "It’s a peach."

The Texas Rangers

CoB.jpg

This was Company B of the old Frontier Battalion about 1880. (Here’s today’s Company B.) About half through now with a review copy of Texana author Mike Cox’s new book on the rangers, The Texas Rangers: Wearing the Cinco Peso 1821 – 1900, I can endorse it with only a quibble or two. Basically it’s a worthy updating of Walter Webb’s 1935 classic. More when I finish it.

Cinco de Mayo:What Is Everybody Celebrating?

Now here’s an iUniverse book well worth the twenty dollars they charge for a paperback. It hardly matters that the title’s annual Mexican and Mexican-American commemoration of an 1862 Mexican whipping of the French army is dealt with in the first forty pages. The rest of the 278-page book, which I found hard to put down for long, is about Napoleon III’s attempted takeover of Mexico while we were busy fighting our Civil War–until the Mexicans, with some post-war help from us, finally drove them out in 1867.

I never knew how inept the French commanders were, though Mexican president Juarez and his loyalists would have been tough adversaries for any invader. I knew "Emperor" Maximilian was out of his element, but not that he was that foolish–or that his more realistic wife had a nervous breakdown. Arranged as a series of vignettes, the book is full of colorful details often missing from the dry histories. For instance, there is the former colonel of a New York regiment of Union volunteers who almost was executed with Maximilian, until the colonel’s wife talked Juarez into sparing him. Things like that make the book a very entertaining adventure, as well as a respectable footnoted history. It also has a nice bibliography for further exploration. Except for a few typos, a misleading blurb on the back cover, and some minor needless repetition, Austin author Donald W. Miles’ work is a great read.

The Great Bridge

Historian David McCullough is best known, these days, for his pullet surprise winning books Truman and John Adams. The Great Bridge, The Epic Story of the Building of the Brooklyn Bridge, was his first popular history, in 1972. It’s a compelling story, even at 562 pages. It interested me, initially, because I worked in Trenton, NJ, in the late-1970s, and became aquainted with the history of the town’s most prominent family, the Roeblings, whose patriarch designed the bridge, though his son (with considerable assistance from his wife) built it. I was aware of the technical challenges, but not the political machinations and corruption surrounding the effort, nor of the builder’s Civil War experiences and fame. All-in-all a great read. I’ll try Truman next.

Yon and West: reporting on Iraq

Michael Yon’s book "Moment of Truth in Iraq" is being praised unstintingly. I liked it. Yon stepped into a gap in coverage and filled it. He shows, quite well, why, as he puts it, Iraqi boys want to grow up to be American soldiers and marines. But he also shows that we have always had too little "paint to cover this barn," and the proposed troop drawdowns are unconscionable when our warriors are still in contact in Mosul and elsewhere.

But Yon’s rather thin book (triple-spaced to make it seem longer) can’t touch Bing West’s "No True Glory," which I am finishing, about the 2004 fights for Fallujah. It’s not only twice as long as Yon’s, but reflects more work. It does tackle less ground but has many more named sources and quotes and is, altogether the better book. West even quotes some marines who are now in legal trouble for things they did in 2004. But I’ll go on contributing my few dollars to Yon’s efforts. He’s got the tougher and, possibly, more important job: bringing the news from the front lines that the MSM rarely touches.

Grant helped Mexico oust the French

Next Cinco de Mayo, it should be remembered that, without the help of American Civil War Gen. Ulysses S. Grant, it might have taken Mexico years longer to oust the French army and their Austrian puppet-monarch Maximillian I.

Grant considered the 1860s French invasion of Mexico (accompanied, at first, by the Spanish and British) to be a threat to the U.S., even an extension of the Southern rebellion. So at his first opportunity, which didn’t come until immediately after Lee surrendered in 1865, Grant writes in the conclusion of volume two of his "Personal Memoirs," he sent Gen. Phillip Sheridan and an army corps to Texas.

Officially, Grant directed Sheridan to force surrender of the remaining Confederate forces here, but he also told him, unofficially, according to Sheridan’s memoirs, to occupy the northern banks of the Rio Grande. The idea was to make the French think an invasion to overthrow Maximillian was imminent–though the American government actually opposed any such thing.

Somehow all of this has been confused, of late, even by Austin public school academics who should know better, into a claim [subsequently removed from the Web] that the Mexican defeat of the French Foreign Legion at Puebla in 1862 (for which Cinco de Mayo is celebrated) somehow enabled the Union to beat the rebels at Gettysburg a year later. I suppose Puebla may have played some minor role in preventing French supply of arms to the Confederacy. But the claim gets silly when the academics then claim that a grateful President Lincoln promptly sent Sheridan to the Rio Grande. Lincoln was murdered before Sheridan was dispatched by Grant–three whole years after Puebla.

Sheridan got right to work, setting up arms and ammunition dumps on the north bank of the river where Mexican patriots, under Gen. Escobedo, could find them. "During the winter and spring of 1866," Sheridan writes, "[we sent] as many as 30,000 muskets from the Baton Rouge Arsenal alone" to "convenient places on our side of the river." Escobedo’s forces, now sufficiently armed, threw out the French and executed Maximillian. So it wasn’t Lincoln, nor his sucessor, Vice-President Andrew Johnson, but Gen. Grant who should get credit for aiding Mexico, something that ought to be acknowledged on Cinco de Mayo–a holiday celebrated more by Mexican-Americans than by Mexican nationals.

UPDATE:  Texana author Mike Cox has a nice review of this book by radio journalist Donald Miles which addresses this issue. Glad to see someone has done it so well.

Love Is A Wild Assault

robert_potter_portrait.jpg

Rob Potter (left), onetime secretary of the navy of the Texas Republic and later a senator in the Republic’s congress, isn’t the main character of this novel with a bodice-ripper title. Harriet Potter is, but there’s no picture of her that I can find on the Web. Nor is the book a bodice-ripper, really, but a real adventure story of a resourceful and brave 19th century woman, only a part of which concerns Potter. Well, a large part. The reviewers at the novel’s Amazon site make it plain that this is a true woman’s book, which many women seem to pass on to their daughters.

This reviewer does likewise. But I think most men would enjoy it, even if some of the male characters are pretty despicable. The most interesting part is that Harriet and Rob were real, and most, if not all of the novel (certainly not all of the dialogue) is based on Harriet’s reporting of her life–in a lengthy, unpublished memoir that came to the attention of the Texas Historical Commission many years ago. The novel was originally published in 1959, but it’s a very contemporary read and one of the most memorable books I’ve encountered. Get a copy. You won’t be disappointed.