The Mexican government, which, among other things, promotes illegal immigration to the U.S., is far more exercised about the Texas execution of convicted rapist and murderer Jose Medellin than your average Mexicano. Gee, I wonder why?
Via Baldilocks
The Mexican government, which, among other things, promotes illegal immigration to the U.S., is far more exercised about the Texas execution of convicted rapist and murderer Jose Medellin than your average Mexicano. Gee, I wonder why?
Via Baldilocks
Comments Off on Medellin execution: Ho-hum
Posted in South of the Border
Tagged death penalty, Jose Medellin, Mexico, Texas
Next Cinco de Mayo, it should be remembered that, without the help of American Civil War Gen. Ulysses S. Grant, it might have taken Mexico years longer to oust the French army and their Austrian puppet-monarch Maximillian I.
Grant considered the 1860s French invasion of Mexico (accompanied, at first, by the Spanish and British) to be a threat to the U.S., even an extension of the Southern rebellion. So at his first opportunity, which didn’t come until immediately after Lee surrendered in 1865, Grant writes in the conclusion of volume two of his "Personal Memoirs," he sent Gen. Phillip Sheridan and an army corps to Texas.
Officially, Grant directed Sheridan to force surrender of the remaining Confederate forces here, but he also told him, unofficially, according to Sheridan’s memoirs, to occupy the northern banks of the Rio Grande. The idea was to make the French think an invasion to overthrow Maximillian was imminent–though the American government actually opposed any such thing.
Somehow all of this has been confused, of late, even by Austin public school academics who should know better, into a claim [subsequently removed from the Web] that the Mexican defeat of the French Foreign Legion at Puebla in 1862 (for which Cinco de Mayo is celebrated) somehow enabled the Union to beat the rebels at Gettysburg a year later. I suppose Puebla may have played some minor role in preventing French supply of arms to the Confederacy. But the claim gets silly when the academics then claim that a grateful President Lincoln promptly sent Sheridan to the Rio Grande. Lincoln was murdered before Sheridan was dispatched by Grant–three whole years after Puebla.
Sheridan got right to work, setting up arms and ammunition dumps on the north bank of the river where Mexican patriots, under Gen. Escobedo, could find them. "During the winter and spring of 1866," Sheridan writes, "[we sent] as many as 30,000 muskets from the Baton Rouge Arsenal alone" to "convenient places on our side of the river." Escobedo’s forces, now sufficiently armed, threw out the French and executed Maximillian. So it wasn’t Lincoln, nor his sucessor, Vice-President Andrew Johnson, but Gen. Grant who should get credit for aiding Mexico, something that ought to be acknowledged on Cinco de Mayo–a holiday celebrated more by Mexican-Americans than by Mexican nationals.
UPDATE: Texana author Mike Cox has a nice review of this book by radio journalist Donald Miles which addresses this issue. Glad to see someone has done it so well.
Comments Off on Grant helped Mexico oust the French
Posted in Civil War, Library, South of the Border
Tagged Cinco de Mayo, Maximillian, Mexico, Napolean III, Phillip Sheridan, Ulysses S. Grant

Want to cut sales of your vodka? Suck up to Mexico and its policy of illegal northbound immigration while insulting the USA. Congratulations, Swedes. This is one more step on your road to becoming an Islamic republic, where drinking isn’t even allowed.
Via Instapundit
UPDATE: Scott has the perfect alternative. Tito’s is fine vodka, in addition to the cache of being a Texas product. Leave Absolut to the Mexicanos.
MORE: Jessica’s Well has a funnier version of the ad. Texas humor, anyway. None better. And this, less xenophobic, one.
Comments Off on Absolut: Lowering market share
Posted in South of the Border
Tagged Absolut vodka, Aztlan, Islamic Sweden, Mexico
So to speak. The old, long-gone revolutionary’s grandson, his namesake, lives in poverty. His children apparently have joined the millions immigrating to the U.S. Vicente Fox, Mexico’s first democratically-elected president, tried to better the lives of Mexico’s poor. But even Fox said it would take a generation or more.
Via Instapundit
"Ladies and Gentlemen," former Mexican president Vicente Fox used to begin his speeches. Such an innocuous phrase, yet it caused him enormous trouble in Mexico. Why? Because all previous presidents and most other politicians addressed their audiences as "Senores," i.e. "Gentlemen." There is little equity for women in machismo-land, you see, a place where even domestic violence is considered a husband and father’s privilege. These are just a few of the revelations in one of the best political books I ever read, Fox’s "Revolution of Hope." I learned more about Mexico from it than I ever learned living here, where even we gringos imagine that we have a certain kinship with Mexico. Fox encourages such feelings because he wants our relationship to grow stronger, and for us to be more welcoming of his paisanos coming here in the millions. I was not sympathetic to that before I read his book. Now I’m wavering. In his unparalleled candor and humor, he makes a compelling case for that and many other things. Ignore most of the critical commentary at Amazon’s site for the book. His Mexican political enemies seem to have taken it over. Probably some "Senores," so-called. But do consider the book. You’ll learn a lot about our closest and, potentially, best neighbor.
Comments Off on Revolution of Hope
Posted in Library, South of the Border
Tagged Mexico, Revolution of Hope, Vicente Fox
I usually enjoy reading San Diego Union columnist Ruben Navarrette, Jr. How many conservative Mexican-American journalists are there, after all? So I’m taking his advice to read former Mexico president Vicente Fox’s new book aimed at an American audience, Revolution of Hope:
"It is full of charming stories and insights into everything from Mexico’s fledgling democracy to its trade with Asia to its precarious relationship with the United States. It should be required reading for anyone who is curious about the effect Latin America will have on the United States for years to come…"
Most of the early reviewers at the book link disliked it. But there’s obviously more to the man whose statue recently was pulled down than most of us know. For instance, his paternal grandfather, Joseph, was an American who migrated to Mexico from Ohio in the 1890s. Chew on that tidbit for a while.
Comments Off on El Presidente’s book
Posted in Library, South of the Border
Tagged Mexico, Revolution of Hope, Ruben Navarrette, Vicente Fox