Tag Archives: TET

1968, forty years on

All the MSM’s 1968 retrospectives this year were inevitable. That’s what the news media does. It fills a hole, or time, when nothing else is available, or interesting enough to the editors, with retrospectives, anniversaries, etc. And 1968 was a truly horrific year. Not just the TET offensive, which was worrisome from my perspective in Infantry OCS, because we knew we were going. Dr. King’s murder didn’t surprise me, though it was sad. I had worried that it might happen. RFK’s murder was a surprise, coming right around the time we graduated in June. Being in the Army made the experience of the year altogether different from the usual stuff the writers will produce in the retrospectives. Few of them serve.

The black riots, for instance. They weren’t surprising by then, but you still had to wonder why they occurred after emancipation from segregation, rather than before. Lots of Army units in the States were training to handle the riots, if necessary. In the Sixth Cav, that fall, we trained to do it not with force, but with a menacing show. Only after the show–which included marching in column, changing to a line and then, after an elaborate fixing of bayonets, slowly advancing–were we to go to lobbing tear gas canisters. Stabbing people was not on the menu, or bullets, though our magazines were full. We were regular Army, not the draft-dodger haven that was the National Guard in those days, which would shoot up Kent State two years later.

What I remember most about our training was that it emphasized that we must leave the mob an exit route. This was not Red China, or Mexico City. The idea was to disperse them, not trap and hurt them. Luckily, we never had to do it for real. In that sense, for me, 1968 was a piece of cake.

Tet on the Tigris

Bush’s political and media opponents are having a grand time with his remark that there may be some similarities between Tet, 1968, in Vietnam and Baghdad, in 2006–at least in the way that the enemy is trying to influence American politics. Poor man, he has no way to win with some people. If he says nothing, he’s uncommunicative. If he says something, he’s either blundered or engaging in spin. British military historian John Kagan says he blundered. At least Kagan’s numbers are instructive.

"By January 1968, total American casualties in Vietnam — killed, wounded and missing — had reached 80,000 and climbing…In a bad week in Vietnam, the US could suffer 2,000 casualties. Since 2003, American forces in Iraq have never suffered as many as 500 casualties a month…In any year of the Vietnam war, the communist party of North Vietnam sent 200,000 young men to the battlefields in the south, most of whom did not return. Vietnam was one of the largest and costliest wars in history. The insurgency in Iraq resembles one of the colonial disturbances of imperial history."

Via Instapundit