Monthly Archives: October 2009

Media lynch mobs

They’re an old, disreputable story, from the early days of journalism where publishers competed in cutthroat fashion to the modern where most of the practitioners have certificates from like-minded liberal degree mills. Hence the reporting and commentary of the majority resembles an echo chamber.

The media (and political, let’s not forget) effort to lynch Rush Limbaugh because he dared consider investing in an NFL franchise is the latest case in point. One outfit after another snatched up scurrilous racist quotes to hang him with, and even when they were exposed as lies, implied that well, they could be true, and therefore…

Rare reader Veeshir contends it is such behavior that is killing newspapers and reducing the viewership of television operations like CNN and MSNBC. I tend to think it’s a business-model problem, but the Limbaugh lynch mob, and the fact that it takes a British newspaper to perform a dispassionate analysis of it is a strong argument for his point of view.

MORE from Instapundit. And this is one nice retraction and apology. Of course libel can be costly.

Hold the phone

Mr. Boy has recently discovered the telephone and how much fun it is to call a friend or get a call from him and talk for hours. For hours when I forget that’s what he’s doing. But even though this sounds amusing, and I must admit has a certain juvenile appeal, I have so far not allowed him to record the outgoing message. Then again, he hasn’t asked to do it. But forewarned, as they say, is forearmed.

Solar cycle 24 is getting weird

Comparing the previous solar minimum (June ’96 to Sept. ’98) with the current one (June ’07 to Sept ’09) shows something strange is happening to Sol. (Scroll down at the link to the yellow-headlined comparison "latest trend charts" on the right side for the chart of the spotless days in each period). Not that solar science has enough observation history behind it to be sure of much of anything.

Meanwhile, the weather is confirming the old idea that Sol controls what happens down here. When you consider that 1998 was the warmest year recorded globally, and the planet has been cooling ever since, it’s not hard to understand why winters are coming earlier and part of the country’s northern tier already is covered with snow that is not melting but is increasing. Not that we mind the rain we’re getting after our long drought, but you have to wonder. Whatever is going on it seems to have very little to do with the CO2 that has the Democrats hot to tax coal and oil out of existence.

Via the Seablogger. PLUS: Record October cold in Minnesota.

USS New York

nygreen.jpg

Not the new one, built from steel from the Twin Towers, but an older cruiser, scuttled in 1942 in Subic Bay, The Phillipines, to keep the conquering Imperial Japanese from capturing it.

To surge, or not to surge: that is the question

Humor from Neo-Neocon. As she says, it’s amazing how few changes Hamlet’s soliloquy needed to fit Barry’s Afghanistan dilemna:

To surge, or not to surge: that is the question:
Whether ’tis nobler in the mind to suffer
The slings and arrows of outrageous battles,
Or put down arms against a sea of troubles,
And by withdrawing end them? To retreat: to fight
No more; and by retreat to say we end
The heart-ache and the thousand natural shocks
That flesh is heir to, ’tis a consummation
Devoutly to be wish’d. To retreat, to leave;
To leave: perchance to lose: ay, there’s the rub;
For in that leaving, what defeat may come
When we have shuffled off this Afghan soil,
Must give us pause: there’s the respect
That makes calamity of a long war;
For who would bear the whips and scorns of polls,
The oppressor’s wrong, the talking head’s contumely,
The pangs of pacifists, the law’s delay,
The insolence of office and the spurns
That patient merit of the unworthy takes,
When he himself might his swift exit make
With a curt order? who would fardels bear,
To grunt and sweat under a weary war,
But that the dread that some would cry “defeat,”
That vicious accusation from whose bourn
No politician returns, puzzles the will
And makes us rather bear those ills we have
Than fly to others that we know not of?
Thus conscience does make cowards of us all;
And thus the native hue of resolution
Is sicklied o’er with the pale cast of thought,
And enterprises of great pith and moment
With this regard their currents turn awry,
And lose the name of action. – Soft you now!
The fair Nobel Committee! Wimps, in thy orisons
Be all my sins forgotten.

Heh. Good luck with that.

Willingham was no poster boy

So says the Corsicana judge who sentenced him to die for the arson-murder of his three children, a toddler and two infants, and he makes a convincing case. For me. It’s a rebuttal to the anti-death penalty crowd–the usual suspects, including the Grits for Breakfast blog and the New Yorker, who think they have a winning hand in the callous wife-beater Willingham.

All because one outside analyst pronounced the state’s fire forensics in the early 90s case faulty. Now other partisans who claim Willingham was "an innocent man" are piling on Gov. Rick Perry, who wasn’t in office when Willingham was convicted but did deny his reprieve, claiming he’s obstructing justice by undercutting a state investigation. One of them is Paul Begala, the famous Democrat attack-dog, who likes to toss around the porn-word "teabaggers" on CNN. What a crew.

As one of the commenters at the Volokh Conspiracy has it: "I know the dude [was] guilty [because] his story makes no sense to me, and I doubt it would to any father. If my daughter woke me up to tell me the house was on fire, well, a lot of things might happen but one thing that isn’t going to happen is that she dies and I live." Nope.

The trouble with Star Trek

Science fiction writer Charles Stross ruined his Merchant Princes series for me with its explicit anti-Bush politics, but I agree with him about Star Trek. I liked it when it was new in the 60s, even retained some interest in it in the 80s. Now I see it’s as bad as the old Edgar Rice Burroughs’ tales of Mars.

That’s because, as CS says, ST merely pastes the sci and tech on top of its storyline, whereas good scifi builds the storyline out of plausible sci and tech which informs the story’s world. Now if he’d just forgone using his fiction for his personal political propaganda, I’d still be looking forward to his books.

Via Instapundit.