In defense of gridlock

Nay, in FAVOR of gridlock. The legacy media is always nattering on about Congress being “productive.” Which  means passing more laws. Geez, Louise, haven’t we got enough laws yet?

Not to mention agencies, such as the EPA and the FCC which nowadays make their own laws (i.e. regulations) without consulting Congress. The EPA plans to regulate cow farts (CO2) and the FCC wants to regulate Facebook (i.e. the Internet). It’s the rule of the bureaucrats. They don’t care which party is in the House or Senate—they’re “productive” all by themselves, i.e. out of control.

0 responses to “In defense of gridlock

  1. Cow farts, however, are mostly methane, with a soupcon of hydrogen sulfide, for flavoring.

    The regulation of CO2 gives them (the government) a much wider range of things with which to meddle.

    jd

  2. Cow farts and Facebook: there is a common thread here, but I can’t express it at the moment 😉

  3. Minutia, minutia. It starts with minutia and expands to cover everything!