Benghazi was a coverup. Is there a Boston one?

“So, via an anonymous leak, we are being told that, at a time when Tsarnaev was still in critical condition and unable to speak, investigators interrogated him––just long enough, apparently, to get his assurance that no one else was involved in the plot.

“Having gotten that non-verbal representation, as we are now told by the anonymous spokesman, the administration promptly got Tsarvaev a lawyer and, in effect, told him to shut up….if the Obama administration wants to obstruct the investigation and prevent all of the facts from being known soon, if ever, it is off to an excellent start.”

It’s amazing how hard the secular Left–which has no use for Christianity and barely tolerates Judaism–works to protect Islam.

Via Powerline.

0 responses to “Benghazi was a coverup. Is there a Boston one?

  1. The bombs have already exploded. “What difference does it make?”

  2. Dick Stanley

    So true. Just keep the welfare checks coming, Hillary and you’re next in line.

  3. I don’t think there is a Boston coverup, just a lot of stonewalling and inability to ‘fes up to … oh well, you keep a clean family blog here, so I posted about it today to save you a few choice words…