Category Archives: Iraq

Bush Derangement Syndrome

The syndrome is going to be spreading like wildfire in the next few days and weeks, post-surge speech, as the loonies demonstrate their need for some serious meds. Here’s an example of the syndrome in breathless action: Paul Craig Roberts, a former assistant secretary of the treasury under–of all people–President Reagan, joining the unwashed in comparing Bush to Hitler:

"Like Hitler, he protects himself from reality with delusion. In his last hours, Hitler was ordering non-existent German armies to drive the Russians from Berlin."

Yes, there is delusion at work here. A form of mass psychosis. Especially among the folks who once criticized Bush for not sending enough troops and, now, criticize him for… sending more troops! We can only hope that mental health professionals are standing by, especially on the east and west coasts.

Via Craig Scanlon, a commenter at No Left Turns 

President Bush unfiltered

I didn’t watch his speech. I rarely watch them anymore as his "performance" is largely irrelevant to me. I’m more interested in what he says, and for that I always await the transcript, which is here. It’s at CBS news, which I normally wouldn’t trust to send out for donuts, but it’s the only one I can find at the moment. When the White House has one up, I’ll switch the link to it. (I found the White House one and switched it.) The surge sounds workable, even logical, focused as it will be on Baghdad and al Anbar. And although he offered no specifics on Iran and Syria he at least said we’d be working (at last) to stop their interference. He only mentioned two carrier strike groups, although a third one is plainly to soon be on the way, but he did mention the security of the region and stopping Iran from getting nukes. All of which may be as pointed inuendo as he feels he is able to offer right now. I hope he has much more in mind.

UPDATE  Two days of furious battles in Baghdad show the fight has begun, re Iraq the Model here

Walking the line

Veteran and freelance embed Michael Yon’s latest, as always, is worth the read:

"With nearly 35 years of continuous military service, Mellinger is the senior most active duty draftee; yet he cruises Iraq like an infantryman. More than 3,000 of our people have been killed in combat here, but if it weren’t for this type of leadership, found in commands throughout Iraq, that number might be 10,000."

Curiouser and curiouser

Save your apologies. It ain’t over yet. The Associated Press, indignant as usual on the subject, now claims to have found its Jamil Hussein, their stringer’s named source for sixty plus dispatches from Iraq. Not surprisingly, the industry’s mouthpiece E&P chimes in on AP’s side, and several bloggers, including Austin Bay, hastened to apologize for ever doubting the wire service. But now it turns out Hussein actually uses his middle name for a surname, i.e. Jamil Gulaim, explaining why it was hard to find him under the pseudonym the AP used. Moreover, he denies ever having spoken to the news media. Plus the AP story for which bloggers first picked up on Hussein/Gulaim–claiming that terrorists set six Iraqi men ablaze–remains disputed and unconfirmed. Not much of a resolution that I can see.

UPDATE  The truth, it seems, is still out there, and AP’s new version is collapsing around its ears. It turns out they never had his name correct to begin with, and repeated the mistake sixty-plus times. Or did they phony it up for some reason other than sloppiness? Film at eleven.

W’s last stand

In Bush’s coming speech Wednesday we’ll learn whether he finally has the will to do what he should already have done, i.e. taken the war to Iran, Syria and, if they don’t stop sending money and volunteers to Iraq’s Sunni insurgency, Saudi Arabia. Or not. He’s made so little effort in the past four years to explain himself and his strategy, popping up every three months or so to make another speech, then disappearing again for another three months, that serious change doesn’t seem to be in him. Apparently he’s just going to shuffle the commanders around and send a token 10,000 more troops to Iraq for "a push," which will be inconsequential in the long run. It will just give the bad guys more American targets to shoot at and bomb, while Iraq’s neighbors keep undermining Iraq and us. Debka sees hope for more than a token effort. But Debka always sees more, whether it materializes or not. For one thing, Debka has the Stennis carrier strike group already headed for the Persian Gulf when the Navy says it won’t leave until late this month. So far, we haven’t even had the sense to arrest or kill Mookie Sadr and put his Shiite militia out of business. Bush might as well bring the troops home, or shuffle some to Afghanistan, where Iran and Pakistan can go on undermining the effort there. Not that I think the Dems have anything more to offer than retreat. Wretchard says what we really need is the will to win. The bitterly divided populace plainly doesn’t have it. It’s becoming apparent that even the leadership doesn’t. Not even 9/11 could produce it, and it remains to be seen if even a second 9/11 would do it. Though we may get the chance to find out.

Surge or escalation?

Democrats already are calling the proposed surge of troops into Iraq "an escalation," reiving the terms of Vietnam. But apparently Bush’s coming speech about what a surge would mean will turn on some aspect of this "secret plan" captured with the Iranians of recent days–who were, then, incredibly, let go.

Omar at Iraq the Model is astounded that anyone would think that the plan’s disclosure of Iranian and Syrian cooperation with the Sunni insurgents and the Shia death squads is unusual:

"This war is different from conventional wars; networks of terror and their relationships with their supporting regimes and the manner in which they work are complex and different than those of conventional enemies and this situation necessitates that our ways evolve and adjust accordingly."

Meanwhile, the Navy says a second carrier battle group for the Persian Gulf won’t leave Washington until later this month. Perhaps it’s just another empty show of force. Or perhaps Bush has finally decided to do something about Syria and Iran, the latter hinting that its bomb will be ready by March 20.

Waiting for a Sherman or a Grant

Historian Victor Davis Hanson returns from Iraq dreaming of the emergence of an American general capable of more than midnight assignations with the MSM for anonymous complaints:

"The traveler to Iraq is struck not by dearth, but opulence—everything imaginable from new SUVs to Eskimo Pies. Internet Service there was far faster than from my home in rural Fresno County…Somewhere in the US military right now is a Grant, Sherman, Patton, Ridgeway, or Abrams…Now is the time to let them come forward—as they have always arisen from obscurity in past American wars when their nation’s hour of need has come."

A good read in which history offers more hope than the shoulda, coulda, woulda war hearings the Dems are about to begin.