Category Archives: Obamalot

Must the GOP run against abortion?

To a certain extent, yes, there’s no question about it. Charles Krauthammer says it would be wiser to run against late-term abortions and say nothing much about the early ones. As if that would do anything except alienate the right-to-lifers in the GOP base who want to ban all abortions. And won’t quit just because they haven’t achieved their aim in forty years.

(They like to say that it took more than forty years to abolish slavery, too.)

Likewise the Dumbos can’t run against late-term abortions because it might cause some of their base—who couldn’t care less about murdering a viable infant if it inconveniences some halfwit woman who waited five months to decide she didn’t want the baby—to sit out an election.

Or as James Taranto puts it: “…a political party is not a unitary organism; it is an unruly coalition of individuals and interest groups. Neither party can win elections without the support of its abortion extremists, which means neither party can will or wish them away.”

Seems to me the main problem the GOP has is not its philosophical disagreement with abortion and same-sex marriage—both of which it must run against to keep its base—but that it’s mostly Democrat-Lite RINOs and its conservative base is fed up with them. To the point where it’s willing to sit out an election rather than vote for another Boehner, Ryan, McCain or Romney. Four million of them apparently did in Willard, the country-club RINO from Utah, by simply staying home.

These conservatives seem to figure that there’s nothing much worse the Dumbos can do to the country. They’ve already crippled the economy with thousands of new regulations on business, demonized the rich who alone can invest in new businesses, whacked people who already had health insurance with higher prices for it while failing to attract the uninsured, and used the IRS and the “justice” department to punish their enemies.

What’s left (so to speak)? Downsizing the military? Check. Rewarding foreign enemies and punishing friends? Check. The RINOs could have stopped some of it if they chose. They haven’t yet and there’s no reason to think they ever will. Shoot, they’re getting ready to please their crony-capitalist buddies and reward a few million low-wage illegal aliens with work permits when millions of American citizens can’t find jobs. Illegals who almost certainly will never vote Republican.

To my mind, neither party is worth a damn and both are hopelessly corrupt. I am just about at the point where I won’t vote for another one of either brand, unless s/he comes with a Tea Party label like Paul or Cruz. Why bother?

Dershowitz: D’Souza persecution partisan malice

“This is an outrageous prosecution and is certainly a misuse of resources,” charged [Harvard law professor Alan M.] Dershowitz. “It raises the question of why he is being selected for prosecution among the many, many people who commit similar crimes.

This sounds to me like it is coming from higher places. It is hard for me to believe this did not come out of Washington or at least get the approval of those in Washington.”

Nice to see even a lefty Democrat like Dershowitz incensed over this obvious political prosecution.

Passive resistence

The flaw in all those new Democrat anti-gun and “high-capacity” magazine registration laws? Ninety percent of gun owners refuse to cooperate, and the state doesn’t have the manpower to do anything about it.

“I’ve seen estimates of 1,000,000 firearm magazines that should have been registered under the law, but the state reports registering only 40,000… just 4 percent.

“Against this backdrop of failure, the anti-gun government of Connecticut is contemplating an ‘amnesty’ to encourage those who haven’t registered to do so…”

Oh, yeah, that’ll work. You bet. Heh.

Never mind revolution, riots, etc. Passive resistance to government overreach is much more effective.

Via Instapundit.

End the drug war

The WaPo’s brilliant new hire (at least for the “opinion” pages, though he outshines their lapdog reporters) Radley Balko marshalls the statistics that show the drug war really is a war on the poor and minorities and the excuse for the militarization and corruption of police agencies and politics in general.

Odd that the war didn’t even rate a mention in Ditherton’s SOTU. And him a minority at that. Too realistic, I suppose.

Via The Volokh Conspiracy.

Will Issa ever act?

“Are [California Republican Rep.] Darrell Issa’s numerous investigations intended to actually accomplish anything in the way of bringing this [gangster] government to heel, or are they intended merely to provide subject matter for his election brochures?”

So far he’s just Deadwood on the Potomac. No more than a font of snappy opposition quotes. No wonder the Republicans lose so many elections.

Via Ed Driscoll.

UPDATE: He does make demands. He just doesn’t back them up by using his committee’s power of issuing subpoenas to publicly humiliate the perp.

MORE:  Issa’s finally moving. He’s recalling the IRS’s 5th Amendment Queen Lois Lerner back to testify on March 5.

Go get ’em, Ted

Our own Sen. Cruz calls on Attorney General Holder to appoint a special prosecutor to probe the IRS scandal, since neither Holder’s office nor the FBI has bothered to interview any of the victims. Forty-one of them.

Although Holder has no problem going after conservatives D’Souza and McDonnell.

Ted, who wants to abolish the IRS altogether and make paying taxes as easy as filling in a postcard and mailing it in with a check, has had more than enough of the “justice” department’s stonewalling of Congress.

Political prosecutions

Conservative anti-Obama filmaker Dinesh D’Souza looks guilty. His lawyer tacitly admits as much, saying well, he didn’t mean any harm.

Former Virginia Gov. Bob McDonnell, a conservative Republican, looks guilty. He apparently took $165,000 from a lobbyist. (Which would not be illegal in Texas, by the way, as long as it was reported.)

The conservative Hollywood group Friends of Abe? Beats me. They’re only being “scrutinized” by B.O.’s pet IRS. The indictments may come later.

Each of these cases has one thing in common: the targets are political conservatives, indicted (or scrutinized) by federal authorities in an election year when B.O.’s neck could be in a noose if his party loses the Senate and can’t regain the House.

Did he order this done or does he merely want it? Or is that the same thing? Used to be you’d be mocked as nuts for suggesting such a federal conspiracy. Nowadays you’d be crazy not to be paranoid.

Especially in Ham Sandwich Nation where everything is a crime and when Americans have every reason not to trust Wormtongue.

Interesting times we live in. Well, that’s one way to put it.

UPDATE:  Instapundit links to Ace who has more examples of American fascism, Chicago style.

MORE: D’Souza had to be bonded out of jail because of the felony charges. Rick Moran points to similar cases tried as misdemeanors with fines, not jail time. Which underscores the politics behind D’Souza’s indictment.