"We get the sense the Saudis grin and kiss us on both cheeks when we walk into their palaces, then spit on the ground the moment we leave."
When you sleep with the oil ticks, you rise up with fleas. Little mixey metaphor there.
"We get the sense the Saudis grin and kiss us on both cheeks when we walk into their palaces, then spit on the ground the moment we leave."
When you sleep with the oil ticks, you rise up with fleas. Little mixey metaphor there.
The Dem presidential candidates and party and congressional leadership prove their unseriousness on the Long War every time they say Afghanistan is where it’s at, not oil-rich and influential Iraq–as Charles Krauthammer so ably demonstrates:
"…you do not decide where to fight on the basis of history; you decide on the basis of strategic realities of the ground. You can argue about our role in creating this new front and question whether it was worth taking that risk in order to topple Saddam Hussein. But you cannot reasonably argue that in 2007 Iraq is not the most critical strategic front in the war on terror."
Worth a read.
Comments Off on Why we fight
Posted in Afghanistan, Iraq, The War
Tagged Afghanistan, Charles Krauthammer, Iraq
The Senate lards on the pork in narrowly passing its version of the troops funding measure. Still to be worked out, apparently, is the Senate’s March 31, 2008 withdrawal-from-Iraq deadline, as opposed to the House’s Sept. 1, 2008 withdrawal date. All of which may be mute if Bush, as expected, vetoes it all. You could call them unpatriotic. But I’d prefer "bought-and-paid-for."
The House Dems’ lonely cry: We’ll end the war by funding the war and, meanwhile, here’s some pork.
"To get her narrow majority of 218 votes, Ms. Pelosi and Appropriations Chairman David Obey had to load it up like a farm bill: $74 million for peanut storage, $25 million for spinach growers, $283 million for dairy farmers–all told, some $20 billion in vote-buying earmarks of the kind Democrats campaigned against last year."
It won’t pass the Senate, of course, and if it does Bush has promised a veto. Just don’t call them unpatriotic.
Strange, really, how the U.S. military capitulates when it comes to trying to influence the media war. I guess they expect to lose with the MSM and so they refuse to try to win. But that’s really pretty stupid. It may please them to, as Michael Yon notes, decline to set up press centers for the benefit of reporters who need reliable Internet and satellite connections, but they are cutting off their own noses.
"Billions of dollars are spent on the war each month, millions of dollars fly around here like sparrows, yet there are no designated places for journalists? While so many soldiers and their families shout for coverage from Afghanistan (remember that place?) and Iraq, I can sometimes be found from midnight to sunrise sitting outside, trying to transmit photos through a wireless network that only works sometimes."
Much is being made in the blogosphere of Gen. Vincent K. Brooks’ apparent threat to kick Yon out of Iraq. I suspect that has less to do with what he writes than his attitude combined with his former status as an NCO trigger-puller. But he also doesn’t fail to paint pictures of the ubiquitous PX with its incongruous multitude of flat-screen TVs, and the steak-and-lobster, cake-and-cookie mess halls which the brass cannot fail to dislike having publicized. It’s supposed to be all about guns-and-glory, not how many discounted components you can buy for your stereo or camera. As Yon’s reporting illustrates, it’s really about both. And it isn’t new. It was like that in Viet Nam, too. But at least there the military tried, and sometimes successfully did, influence MSM coverage.
Comments Off on Information war surrender
Posted in Afghanistan, Iraq, The War, Troops
Tagged Gen. Vincent K. Brooks, information war, Iraq, Michael Yon
When a political party manufactures a phony scandal, like abhoring "political reasons" for the AG’s recent sacking of six political appointees, we should look for the vanishing pea under the moving cups. Don Suber says the pea is the anti-war movement’s sudden escalation to office takeovers of their Dem supporters. Quick, hide the pea!