Tag Archives: Iraq

Adios, Sammy

Tonight’s the night, roughly between 8:30 and 9:00 p.m. CST. The mass murderer joins his rapacious sons in hell. Hangman, set your knot.

UPDATE  It’s over. Happened close to 9 p.m. CST, near as I can figure out from the various reports, including this one. Good riddance. Through the wonder (?) of the Internet, here’s a (not especially gruesome) cell phone video of Sammy taking the fall. Youtube may not leave it up too long. It showed that the knot didn’t seem to be set too close to his left ear, as if maybe the executioner wasn’t too concerned about breaking his neck quickly. But the last scene suggests, by the tilt of his head, that it worked correctly after all. So he got off easier than some of his victims.

We can run but we can’t hide

Here’s one congressman who didn’t go visit Baby Assad, but came back from a Middle East trip sobered anyway.

"While we are naturally focused on Iraq, a larger war is emerging. On one side are extremists and terrorists led and sponsored by Iran, on the other moderates and democrats supported by the United States."

Joe Lieberman in the WaPo is worth a read. He supports more troops to secure Baghdad and Anbar. But what, really, is to prevent the enemy from just waiting until we leave to resume? Possibly a combination of their invigorated army, plus a stronger government to support them. The question, in my mind, is do we really have any choice but to press on?

Weasel 61

John Kerry’s fact-finding trip to Iraq apparently was less than pleasant. But he could get the last laugh.

UPDATE  The Liberal blogs, led by TPM Muckraker, went ballistic over a photo at the "less" link above. Then Kerry’s aide also fought back but, in the end, the annonymous staff officer Ben of Mesopotamia declared it a draw and I agree. It’s pretty obvious that many troops despise Kerry, for a variety of reasons. Not all of them, of course, and BoM was generously evenhanded to him in the "less" link. Far more than I would have bothered to be.

Iraq update

Not the gloom and doom narrative you find in the MSM, in fact rather opposed to their view:

"[M]orale among our guys is very high. They not only believe that they are winning, but that they are winning decisively. They are stunned and dismayed by what they see in the American press, whom they almost universally view as against them. The embedded reporters are despised and distrusted."

Interesting look at the overall tactical situation in Iraq by Cliff May at The Corner at the conservative National Review Online–a magazine few media subscribe to, altho they all get The [liberal] Nation. Worth a read.

UPDATE  Well I was fooled and I don’t appreciate it one bit. I have emailed The Corner to see what they have to say about this, although I don’t see any effort on their part to claim it is new, when it is more than a year old, but they didn’t point out that it was old, either. Thanks a bunch, NRO.

Go big? Just like Vietnam

It’s hard to tell if the pundits know anything or if they’re just misunderestimating Bush, as usual. Heck, most of them predicted he would hop up on James Baker’s hobby horse and ride off to Tehran and Damascus to plead for help. So is there any real evidence that he wants to throw more troops at the problems in Iraq, like many of them are saying now? Hope not. It might just be Vietnam all over again, the way the anti-wars believe it already is. American troops all over the place, the Iraqi troops (read South Vietnamese army) sitting on their hands watching the Americans chew up neighborhoods, lots more American and civilian casualties. And, in the end, when the troops go home, nothing much to show for it as the insurgents surge back in. So I’m keeping my fingers crossed that the pundits, including irascible Ralph Peters, really don’t know what they’re talking about.

Peters, in particular, seems to have lost his way lately. He still gets a lot of respect from retired military careerist friends of mine, but sometimes he just doesn’t make any sense. He’s for Go big, but only if the rules of engagement change: ignore the MSM, shoot to kill, disarm the population, swarm the streets of Baghdad. Fat chance. The World War II days of saturation bombing are long gone. Do it precisely, directed by 30,000 or so advisers on the ground embeded with the Iraqi army, or forget about it. And start by killing Mookie Sadr, or at least ship him to Guantanamo. My two cents. The great thing about blogs is I get to spend mine. So do you if you care to comment. Just keep it civil.

UPDATE  Blogger Bill Roggio, embeded with Marine advisers to the Iraqi Army is reporting stuff I haven’t seen anywhere else. Some of it is good: the Iraqi troops are brave and resourceful and tactically profficient. All they really need advisors for is help with resupply, and heavy weapons. Presumably also medevac, although it isn’t mentioned. The bad stuff sounds a lot like the worst of the South Vietnamese army’s problems. The Iraqi government is so inept (or corrupt) that their troops can’t get rifles, helmets or body armor, not even their own pay! Surely we can do better for them. While you’re at Roggio’s place, hit his tip jar. He’s already doing more than the MSM has. 

Fixes and folly

The two best ideas of the Iraq Study Group’s 79 recommendations are being implemented, according to Bing West, a Vietnam veteran and former assistant secretary of defense in the Reagan administration. Namely, vastly increasing the number of American advisers with the Iraqi army (which CENTCOM press releases said before the report was released was already underway), and turning that army over to the new Iraqi government by late spring. The latter because former CENTCOM commander Gen. John P. Abizaid has told Congress that Iraqi PM Maliki will, by February, take care of the main threat of civil war, Mookie Sadr and his murderous militia.

Meanwhile, the most ridiculous ideas, it is generally agreed, are the ones about negotiating with the dictators of Iran and Syria to help stabilize the situation–as if they wanted the first successful Arab democracy on their borders. So, naturally, that is what Sen. Kerry has set out to do. He is flaunting federal law and White House policy to go visit Baby Assad in Damascus to chat it up. Not too surprising, since Kerry flaunted federal law and Nixon White House policy in the early 1970s to go to Paris to meet with the North Vietnamese.

The scuttlebutt is that the Paris trip cost Kerry, who was still a Navy reserve officer, a dishonorable discharge, which President Carter later fixed. But we can’t be sure until Big John releases his military records, which he has consistently refused to do. At least he’s no longer in the military, so he hasn’t that part to worry about. And, so far at least, he doesn’t plan to go to Iran.

Bad pennies, etc.

They do, in fact, always turn up. Eason Jordan, for instance, the disgraced former president of CNN (known to American veterans as the Communist News Network) has a new Internet news site focusing entirely on Iraq. Which is odd (or appropriate, perhaps) considering he was best known for sucking up to Saddam before the 2004 liberation. Until, that is, he asserted at several foreign venues that the American military was purposely targeting journalists for death. Something tells me his new venture will not be far afield of his old employer and may even come to rival al Jiz for mendacity. But we shall see.