Tag Archives: the surge

Baghdad dying. Again.

It’s an old rule. American soliders win a war. American politicians lose it. It’s a wonder anyone serves.

Baby Barry and the surge

There’s a lot of teeth gnashing in the conservative blogosphere over BB’s tap dancing around the question of whether he should have backed the surge, given its success in Iraq. I watched the cBS video here and, though I don’t care much for his politics, I have to say his answer is no more than what any politician, who didn’t wish to step down from his earlier judgement, would do. He didn’t put down the troops, as some are suggesting. He acknowleged their success, he just questioned the surge strategy itself.

On the contrary, the shift in military strategy, from large unit fighting to establishing lasting community security was almost more important than the additional manpower. As Mac says it’s definitely the way to win in Afghanistan, as well. It’s just harder there because the people have fewer resources to fall back on, and the terrain is more difficult, with communities more isolated. And with advisers like Gen. McPeak, Barry might just go back to trying to win cheaply, with bombing.

UPDATE:  This, however (scroll to the bottom of the post) is a lie, plain and simple. Why it’s called a gaffe is beyond me. Politicians tell gaffes. Ordinary people tell lies. But to me, Baby Barry told a lie, to make himself look good. Instead, he looks very, very bad. See if you don’t agree.

Mac: the surge is the key to Afghanistan

It’s the way to win the Afghanistan campaign, McCain says, logically enough…

"…if I’m elected President, I will turn around the war in Afghanistan, just as we have turned around the war in Iraq, with a comprehensive strategy for victory."

…versus Baby Barry’s unserious preference to abandon Iraq in favor of hunting down (the quite probably already dead) Osama bin Forgotten.

Via Belmont Club.

Mookie takes a powder

Best news yet from Iraq. Mookie has lit out for the territories, i.e. to his buddies in Tehran:

"Sources believe al Sadr is worried about an increase of 20,000 U.S. troops in the Iraqi capital. One official told ABC News’ Martha Raddatz, "He is scared he will get a JDAM [bomb] dropped on his house. Sources say some of the Mahdi army leadership went with al Sadr."

He should have been killed a long time ago. But skedaddling will have to do. Captain Ed has more.

UPDATE  Well, maybe not, according to his Iraq associates, one of whom calls the little thug "his eminence." Let’s hope his demise becomes imminent.

A cry for help from Baghdad

An exile in Britain talks to his mother on the phone from Baghdad where life goes on amid the truck bombs and murdered relatives and no one is safe: 

"Not even Bush’s death will solve our problem. I’ll be lying if I say I lost hope. When you are in love it is hard to do so. But my aims for Iraq have changed. I want this horrifying hybrid of a government to succeed and the 21,000 extra troops to take control. All I dream of which is no different to the millions of Iraqis is damage control force."

Read it all here.

Last chance talk unfair

A fairly heartbreaking, and arresting analysis of the coming surge by Mohammed at Iraq the Model:

"It is unfair to demand the impossible from the coming operations; total eradication of terrorism and militias within months is a long shot because the violence in Iraq is a result of domestic and regional conflicts that are not limited to Baghdad and it is part of heavy legacy of mistakes and evil the Baath era left."