Category Archives: Civil War

The Disagreement

winder.jpg

The beginnings of Winder Hospital, which became one of Richmond’s largest in the Civil War, where my great grandfather, a private in Barksdale’s Mississippi Brigade, spent several months in 1862.

The post title, however, is that of this historical novel I recently finished about the training and coming-of-age of a young Virginia doctor during the war. Not at Winder, but at Charlottesville General Hospital on the UVA campus. A good story worth your time only if you are captivated by the period. The hero’s stuffed-shirt personality and the author’s extensive use of the vernacular can be annoying. The hero’s clinical detachment serves him well as a doctor but can make him a tiresome human being. Such jarring notes as his disinterest in religion are more modern than nineteenth century.

Now and then I felt trapped in some period memoir, becoming confused by the use of passive voice and multiple parentheticals. One detail, a slouch cap, was silly. A slouch was a hat, not a cap. Nevertheless, I found it hard to put down for long. I did miss the bleeding and cupping, two common treatments of the time to relieve fevers which were later discarded as doing only harm. I suppose the hero would have looked pretty stupid using either one and so they were left out.

The author obviously put a great deal of work into the tale (recounted in the back pages aknowledging his grants) and so I felt a little guilty at being able to acquire it almost new for one penny plus four dollars shipping. He can thank Amazon for that. One does wonder how the classical writers ever did it, without masters degrees in fine arts, writing workshops and multiple grants.

Red meat: secession!

It’s understandable, what with the whopping deficit that Barry & the Dems are running up, that Texas Gov. Rick Perry would want to run for re-election against the federal government. Especially when his likely primary opponent is U.S. Senator Kay Baily Hutchinson.

So, on the occasion of the Tax Day Tea Party protest, Perry decided to throw Big Media and its liberal pals a little red meat about potential secession. Not that Texas would or could. Can’t keep our sales and property taxes relatively low (not to mention no income tax at all) without all those federal dollars. But it’s nice to see a independent action now and then from the Repubs.

UPDATE:  The Seablogger gives Rick more credit than I think he deserves, but he makes other, better points. Rick Perry for president in 2012? That would be interesting. I expect he’ll concentrate on getting re-elected governor, first.

Raparations for slavery

Money, in other words, for the African-American community of American slave descent. An old black woman I knew near Holly Springs, MS, dead now for several years, was a plaintiff in a lawsuit designed to win economic reparations for slavery. She, whose grandparents had been owned by my maternal ancestors near Oxford, never expected to win and, indeed, she died before the case was adjudicated. I believe it was thrown out.

But she didn’t need the money. She had inherited cotton land acquired through great diligence and prudence by her grandparents, the freed slaves, and their children, her parents. But she, who had taken to wearing African dress in her old age, wanted the raparations money for the symbolic value. That’s apparently what Barry had in mind, in 2001, with his talk of redistributing, which has now become a campaign issue. Ironic, considering that he is not descended from American slaves, or, on his white side, slave owners, as far as I know. Would it matter if he succeeded in passing out some money? Probably not to the spendthrifts. Would it be worth the symbolism? Perhaps, if that was as far as it went. But Barry, the Left’s stealth candidate, apparently has a great deal more in mind.

Meanwhile, Mississippi has thirty-four thousand unverified new voters to struggle with next week.

Dems use bailout for radical pork

I had a suspicion the Dems would want to prolong the economic agony as a way to help their presidential candidate. When the economy falters, as the saying goes, the voters turn to the party out of power. Hence liberal Big Media’s partisan assertion all year that we are in a recession, despite the lack of statistical evidence for it.

But it never occurred to me the Dems were so cynical as to try to use the bailout bill to benefit the very groups whose radical missions (in pursuing no-money-down minority housing loans) helped create the mess. No, not Freddie and Fannie, but La Raza, ACORN, and the Urban League.

The Seablogger calls it "a kind of creeping civil war, conducted through politics, in accordance with revolutionary theory," which Mac probably knew about and was determined to thwart when he pulled his return-to-the-Capitol-to-look-presidential stunt. Presidential politics has always been fierce, and 2008 seems especially so, though I suppose if we’d lived in the 1850s, in the runup to the real, shooting Civil War, we might think this was all pretty tame.

Grant helped Mexico oust the French

Next Cinco de Mayo, it should be remembered that, without the help of American Civil War Gen. Ulysses S. Grant, it might have taken Mexico years longer to oust the French army and their Austrian puppet-monarch Maximillian I.

Grant considered the 1860s French invasion of Mexico (accompanied, at first, by the Spanish and British) to be a threat to the U.S., even an extension of the Southern rebellion. So at his first opportunity, which didn’t come until immediately after Lee surrendered in 1865, Grant writes in the conclusion of volume two of his "Personal Memoirs," he sent Gen. Phillip Sheridan and an army corps to Texas.

Officially, Grant directed Sheridan to force surrender of the remaining Confederate forces here, but he also told him, unofficially, according to Sheridan’s memoirs, to occupy the northern banks of the Rio Grande. The idea was to make the French think an invasion to overthrow Maximillian was imminent–though the American government actually opposed any such thing.

Somehow all of this has been confused, of late, even by Austin public school academics who should know better, into a claim [subsequently removed from the Web] that the Mexican defeat of the French Foreign Legion at Puebla in 1862 (for which Cinco de Mayo is celebrated) somehow enabled the Union to beat the rebels at Gettysburg a year later. I suppose Puebla may have played some minor role in preventing French supply of arms to the Confederacy. But the claim gets silly when the academics then claim that a grateful President Lincoln promptly sent Sheridan to the Rio Grande. Lincoln was murdered before Sheridan was dispatched by Grant–three whole years after Puebla.

Sheridan got right to work, setting up arms and ammunition dumps on the north bank of the river where Mexican patriots, under Gen. Escobedo, could find them. "During the winter and spring of 1866," Sheridan writes, "[we sent] as many as 30,000 muskets from the Baton Rouge Arsenal alone" to "convenient places on our side of the river." Escobedo’s forces, now sufficiently armed, threw out the French and executed Maximillian. So it wasn’t Lincoln, nor his sucessor, Vice-President Andrew Johnson, but Gen. Grant who should get credit for aiding Mexico, something that ought to be acknowledged on Cinco de Mayo–a holiday celebrated more by Mexican-Americans than by Mexican nationals.

UPDATE:  Texana author Mike Cox has a nice review of this book by radio journalist Donald Miles which addresses this issue. Glad to see someone has done it so well.

Personal Memoirs of U.S. Grant

I finished volume one, having learned a few things I didn’t know. I enjoyed Grant’s direct, detailed style, without the usual flowery to-do of the 1880s. No wonder the memoir is considered a classic.

Hand grenades, for instance. I seem to remember a reference to them before, in one of the many books I’ve read by or about Civil War participants. But Grant tells me they were used by the Confederates in defense of Vicksburg. This site shows one at the bottom of the page, with a paper streamer designed to make it land on the percussion cap in the front to fire it. The Union had them, also.

Exploding musket-balls, now, I never heard of those. "…the wound was terrible," writes Grant who says Union troops also encountered them at Vicksburg. Various Web sites show the ex-Confederates denied using them, but accused the Union of doing so. It’s hard to imagine how to make one.

One of Grant’s interesting points: The South had a great advantage at the beginning of the war in that they had close to forty percent of the Nation’s trained soldiers. And because they had no standing army, those soldiers had to find service with their own state units, meaning "The whole loaf was leavened." The Union’s trained soldiers were largely concentrated in the regular army alone.

Good book. I recommend it. On to volume two.

Grant’s memoirs

I was browsing an Australian army list of military histories when I saw a reference to U.S. Grant’s memoirs, written hastily as he was dying of throat cancer in 1885, yet praised ever after as a literary masterpiece. I ordered the two-volume set in paperback from Amazon, and look forward to reading it. I’d thought of doing so, after recently reading a new more-candid look at R.E. Lee, but had forgotten.