Category Archives: South of the Border

Ran Runnels, the Hangman of Panama

They’re still trying to figure out if Randolph Runnels really was a Texas Ranger before he was hired by the builders of the first transcontinental railroad (forty-seven miles across the Isthmus of Panama connecting the Atlantic with the Pacific) to solve a nasty bandido problem.

 Runnels didn’t fit the physical image of a Ranger, according to historian David McCullough in his 1992 book Brave Companions, but he acted the myth well enough: he hanged seventy-eight men in two separate incidents in 1852 and, lo and behold, the banditry stopped. The Texas Rangers Association apparently has no record of Ran’s Ranger service, but their records admittedly aren’t complete. But at least one railroad historian found sources crediting the Ranger tale, and there was a Runnels who had to do with the Rangers in the 1850s, Texas Gov. Hardin Runnels who took office in 1858. He was a champion of the Indian-fighting Rangers and he may have been Randolph’s brother.

Cinco de Mayo:What Is Everybody Celebrating?

Now here’s an iUniverse book well worth the twenty dollars they charge for a paperback. It hardly matters that the title’s annual Mexican and Mexican-American commemoration of an 1862 Mexican whipping of the French army is dealt with in the first forty pages. The rest of the 278-page book, which I found hard to put down for long, is about Napoleon III’s attempted takeover of Mexico while we were busy fighting our Civil War–until the Mexicans, with some post-war help from us, finally drove them out in 1867.

I never knew how inept the French commanders were, though Mexican president Juarez and his loyalists would have been tough adversaries for any invader. I knew "Emperor" Maximilian was out of his element, but not that he was that foolish–or that his more realistic wife had a nervous breakdown. Arranged as a series of vignettes, the book is full of colorful details often missing from the dry histories. For instance, there is the former colonel of a New York regiment of Union volunteers who almost was executed with Maximilian, until the colonel’s wife talked Juarez into sparing him. Things like that make the book a very entertaining adventure, as well as a respectable footnoted history. It also has a nice bibliography for further exploration. Except for a few typos, a misleading blurb on the back cover, and some minor needless repetition, Austin author Donald W. Miles’ work is a great read.

ObamaChe

obamache.jpg

Tigerhawk asks why we keep seeing Che posters in the offices of Baby Barry supporters like this liberal judge who is trying to overturn Ohio’s death penalty. Even Fidel thought Che was a moron.

Grant helped Mexico oust the French

Next Cinco de Mayo, it should be remembered that, without the help of American Civil War Gen. Ulysses S. Grant, it might have taken Mexico years longer to oust the French army and their Austrian puppet-monarch Maximillian I.

Grant considered the 1860s French invasion of Mexico (accompanied, at first, by the Spanish and British) to be a threat to the U.S., even an extension of the Southern rebellion. So at his first opportunity, which didn’t come until immediately after Lee surrendered in 1865, Grant writes in the conclusion of volume two of his "Personal Memoirs," he sent Gen. Phillip Sheridan and an army corps to Texas.

Officially, Grant directed Sheridan to force surrender of the remaining Confederate forces here, but he also told him, unofficially, according to Sheridan’s memoirs, to occupy the northern banks of the Rio Grande. The idea was to make the French think an invasion to overthrow Maximillian was imminent–though the American government actually opposed any such thing.

Somehow all of this has been confused, of late, even by Austin public school academics who should know better, into a claim [subsequently removed from the Web] that the Mexican defeat of the French Foreign Legion at Puebla in 1862 (for which Cinco de Mayo is celebrated) somehow enabled the Union to beat the rebels at Gettysburg a year later. I suppose Puebla may have played some minor role in preventing French supply of arms to the Confederacy. But the claim gets silly when the academics then claim that a grateful President Lincoln promptly sent Sheridan to the Rio Grande. Lincoln was murdered before Sheridan was dispatched by Grant–three whole years after Puebla.

Sheridan got right to work, setting up arms and ammunition dumps on the north bank of the river where Mexican patriots, under Gen. Escobedo, could find them. "During the winter and spring of 1866," Sheridan writes, "[we sent] as many as 30,000 muskets from the Baton Rouge Arsenal alone" to "convenient places on our side of the river." Escobedo’s forces, now sufficiently armed, threw out the French and executed Maximillian. So it wasn’t Lincoln, nor his sucessor, Vice-President Andrew Johnson, but Gen. Grant who should get credit for aiding Mexico, something that ought to be acknowledged on Cinco de Mayo–a holiday celebrated more by Mexican-Americans than by Mexican nationals.

UPDATE:  Texana author Mike Cox has a nice review of this book by radio journalist Donald Miles which addresses this issue. Glad to see someone has done it so well.

Slaughter at Goliad

I finished this one last night, sandwiched in between the first and second volumes of U.S. Grant’s memoirs, and it was well worth the buy and the read. It’s billed as the most comprehensive look at the massacre, and I’d go along with that, though I haven’t read many others. Especially interesting is the section on weapons, which explains how so many of the American volunteers killed so many Mexican soldados in the Battle of Coleto, while they survived, and how the few survivors of of the massacre got away: the Mexican Brown Bess flintlock muskets were rendered poorer by weak, field-made powder.

I’ve seen several descriptions of how Fannin, who was executed last, supposedly asked not to be shot in the face but was, anyhow. Author Jay Stout quotes from the only eyewitness account, available at this site at Texas A&M, that Fannin actually asked only that the Mexican muskets not be held so close to his face that it receive powder burns, but he was disregarded. A strange sort of vanity, either way. You can find a good deal of the background material Stout cites here and at the A&M site. His bibliography is worth having by itself, and much of it also is online. Despite recent efforts to get the Mexican government to return the flag of the New Orleans Greys, about half of whom were murdered at Goliad, I agree with Stout that it belongs in Mexico, but wish that it would be put on display or, at least, photographed for public view.

Good as Stout’s book is, I must reiterate, that if you can only afford/read one book on the Texas Revolution, Stephen Hardin’s Texian Illiad is still the best.

The Mexico Program

Parents and siblings of students at Mr. B.’s public elementary are rearranging their schedules this week to be sure to be present at Thursday night’s Mexico Program. You know, the little ones will stumble through the Mexican Hat Dance and we’ll all shout Andele! Arriba! It’s not that I mind a Mexico Program. It’s that we don’t also have a Texas Program and/or an American Program. Instead we here in the super-liberal Austin school district only get to celebrate the "culture" of the racist plutocracy to the south. Why is that, anyhow?

Cinco de Rocket

Instead of doing Mexican hat dances in honor of a certain defeat of a French Foreign Legion unit army many years ago by Mexican forces, why not celebrate the Mexican Rocket Helicopter? Thirty-second flights guaranteed. Just watch out for trees. Also a semi-respectable report from National Progressive Radio.