Tag Archives: Obamacare

Image

Forward!

Behind Uncle Barry’s warning to the Supremes

“The president and his followers want to be able to labor on our behalf, and to make all of our important decisions.  Many of them, like their European counterparts, firmly believe this is the best way to achieve the common good.

“Others are driven by disgust with contemporary America and the American people, and see themselves acting to save the world from our own worst instincts and impulses.  Still others are elitists who despise the common people, who are so plainly unworthy of respect.

“Whatever the motivation, the ‘solution’ is to restrict the freedom of Americans in order that the superior beings who currently control the executive branch can dictate policy.”

Fortunately, it’s the job of the Supremes to approve or disapprove executive branch policy. Whatever Uncle Barry thinks about it.

Indeed, the 5th Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans got a little riled.

Via PJMedia

Beggars In Spain

This first of a Nancy Kress sci-fi classic trilogy could as readily be titled Beggars In Dallas, even though it was only a metaphor in the first place. Some of the rest of the book, despite its focus on genetic enhancements, has a sort of outdated feel to it, as well. Well, it was written several decades ago.

But the philosophical argument the story and characters illustrate, between Ayn Rand individualism and the Russian immigrant author’s despised forced altruism is as fresh as the deficit-reducing Tea Party versus Obamacare.

In the end, Kress’s main protagonist decides a compromise between producers and beggars works best and that seems wise. It’s also rather obvious, but in the author’s deft hands, getting there is well worth the journey.

Memo to the Titanic

I’m trying to ignore our ignoble politics, wishing a pox on both parties. So I think the best way to deal with this weekend’s takeover of the health-care system is to ignore it. But the Seablogger’s take is just too good to miss (including the title above):

“I am a cancer patient, and I would have been dead years ago if my private insurer had not seen me through. Your death panels would surely disallow the drugs that have kept me alive. My life lacks the social worth to be prolonged.”

Oh, indeed. Only the young (and Dems) will prosper from this catastrophe.

UPDATE:  Usually, the legacy media can be counted on to cover a protest at the hint of a chant. Ah, but not when they’re the wrong kind of protesters.

The Doc In The Box

I’m glad to see these retail-ish medical clinics, which are very popular in Austin, are proliferating. But I’m surprised to see there’s only 1,200 plus across the country.

They are pretty cheap and they really do give the lie to the supposed need for Obamacare. Even the illegal hoards the Dems want to insure (so their numbers keep growing and they keep voting Dem) can afford a doc in the box.

Goodbye health insurance, hello FEMA

“…the most basic human right, the right to bargain in a free marketplace.”

–from The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress by Robert A. Heinlein

Mrs. Charm insists that we’ll still keep our health insurance under Obamacare. But it’s becoming obvious that is not the plan. The Dems want us all to report to FEMA, or its equivalent, whenever we have a health problem that costs more than a few bucks to remedy. You know, FEMA, that oh-so-efficient bureaucracy?

If the Dems were truly about fixing health care to help the poor, they’d reform Medicaid and Medicare to do it. Make both less restrictive, more inclusive, cheaper to get, more efficient, etc. Right now, among Medicaid’s problems, it requires states to pony up matching funds for every dollar the feds contribute. That doesn’t work in states like Texas where raising taxes is a sure road to political death.

So eliminate the matching funds. Fund the whole thing from Washington. Why not? The Senate deal for passage of their bill included full funding for Nebraska. Why not the rest of the states?

As for Medicare, we know of one local fellow who pays extra-high premiums to Medicare to be covered for a pre-existing problem. Well, why not eliminate such restrictions? I mean if the aim truly is to help the poor?

Doctors don’t like Medicare because it seldom pays what they spend on treatment. Apparently that will only get worse under the Senate bill recently passed. So change that, too. Or is Obamacare about something else entirely?

Maybe this: IMO, Obama immediately siding with the black professor over the white middle class cop brought into question Obama’s racial neutrality. That suspicion has carried over to the health plan that looks more and more like a transfer payment from the private middle class sector to the minority community that is more dependent on the government.”

Maybe. But it still doesn’t explain why a reformed Medicaid and Medicare wouldn’t be enough. Unless, Ol’ Barry really is a doctrinaire Socialist who just can’t stand the thought of a free market. Except for him and his elite friends, of course.

UPDATE:  Indeed, Mickey Kaus says the Dems outlook could be grim.

Hatin’ on Obamacare

The latest hater? Jeffrey S. Flier, the dean of Harvard Medical School, who says it is not real reform because it will only increase costs, not improve quality and, worse:

“Ultimately, our capacity to innovate and develop new therapies would suffer most of all.”

Stuff like this really beautiful new result: A one-shot gene therapy to help kids born blind to see.

Via Instapundit.

UPDATE:  Then there’s always the plan to save money by telling women in their forties to skip the annual mammogram.