Tag Archives: health care reform

The health takeover

Look on the bright side. Now we get to find out what’s in this bill the Dems have been hiding and lying about all this time. And, as NRO’s Kathryn Lopez says:

“Congratulations, Democrats. Beginning now, you own the health-care system in America. Every hiccup. Every complaint. Every long line. All yours.”

Indeed, henceforth, as things fall apart, we will know whom to blame.

UPDATE:  Texas AG Abbot plans to file a multi-state lawsuit (apparently Texas, Virginia, Florida and several others)  the moment the bill is signed into law, seeking its overturn as unconstitutional.

Memo to the Titanic

I’m trying to ignore our ignoble politics, wishing a pox on both parties. So I think the best way to deal with this weekend’s takeover of the health-care system is to ignore it. But the Seablogger’s take is just too good to miss (including the title above):

“I am a cancer patient, and I would have been dead years ago if my private insurer had not seen me through. Your death panels would surely disallow the drugs that have kept me alive. My life lacks the social worth to be prolonged.”

Oh, indeed. Only the young (and Dems) will prosper from this catastrophe.

UPDATE:  Usually, the legacy media can be counted on to cover a protest at the hint of a chant. Ah, but not when they’re the wrong kind of protesters.

Remember C. Everett Koop?

President Reagan’s onetime surgeon general is fighting the Democrat health care “reform” in a new ad:

“I’m 93 and thank God for every year. I’m here with 2 artificial joints, 2 pacemakers to keep my heart in rhythm, as well as a stent to keep my coronaries open. Seniors in this country can get the care I received, but in some places, like the United Kingdom, we would be considered too old and the cost to the state too high. It is vital that America’s seniors understand what Congress is doing. But Democrats are working on a health care bill — and keeping the discussion and specifics secret. We seniors are concerned about proposals that would reduce Medicare spending. The Administration promised transparent deliberation, which has not been forthcoming. America deserves better than this.”

Worth a look.

Sarah: Kill the bill

Sarah Palin, using her Facebook account as a periodic press release, is fighting tonight’s Dem vote on health care "reform":

"While this Saturday night vote might seem like a procedural matter, at the end of the day a vote against Senator Reid’s motion is a vote against massive new government spending and a take-over of 1/6th of the U.S. economy; it’s a vote against billions in tax increases and penalties; it’s a vote against federal funding of abortion; and it’s a vote against ignoring responsible tort reform."

Sarah, whose education and experience are so assiduously disputed by her Dem and old media detractors, can count the dean of Harvard Medical School in her corner on this one:

"…it’s entirely unclear how such unspecified changes would impact physician practices and compensation, hospital organizations and their capacity to invest, and the ability of patients to receive the kind and quality of care they desire. Similar challenges would eventually confront the entire country on a more explosive scale if the current legislation becomes law."

Course even if tonight’s vote to move the bill to the floor succeeds, it and the House version are different and must be reworked into one by a conference committee. Only then can two final votes occur, one in the House, the other in the Senate. So tonight is only the beginning of the game. And even if the bill were eventually to be voted down, we can assume the Dem leadership would come up with another one and try again. With Barry’s approval rating already in free-fall, they have to be worried about losing their majority in 2010.

UPDATE:  Reidcare moves on. With a little $300 million help for his friend. But there’s still plenty of time to kill this turkey.

Sarah’s reply

Nice to see Sarah Palin coming right back atacha, Barry:

"We know from long experience that the creation of a massive new bureaucracy will not provide us with ‘more stability and security,’ but just the opposite. It’s hard to believe the President when he says that this time he and his team of bureaucrats have finally figured out how to do things right if only we’ll take them at their word."

I still say, along with L.E. Ikenga, the Nigerian-American conservative woman critic of Barry, that Sarah ("an original who [unlike Hillary] will not be used and abused") would make a great president. If the GOP has the guts to nominate her.

Dropping the “public option”?

Even if that proves to be the case, in a truncating of Obamacare, and it would be welcome, there are, nevertheless, plenty of other government-intrusive, central-planning and rationing schemes still afloat.

AND:  Stunts like these pulled by Houston’s idiot congresswoman Sheila Jackson Lee don’t help a bit.

Sarah wins one: the death panels removed

Sarah Palin may not be a candidate for a national anything yet, but she’s already whooped Barry on his so-called health care reform. She named the end-of-life provision in the proposed bill a "death panel" for the sick, the elderly and the disabled. Barry, rather inexplicably for a president, a species that usually tries to stay above the fray, fought back in public. Sarah stuck to her guns. Now the Senate is removing the provision from its version of the bill. Go gettum, Sarah!

UPDATE:  She isn’t satisifed, however. I love the way she’s using the intertubes to get her voice out.