Tag Archives: Instapundit

Why I don’t Tweet

For one thing, they’re so short and pithy, you can wind up seeming to mean something you didn’t intend. Or if you say something you do intend it might be understandable in context but look very unwise standing alone. For instance.

Now I think the Duncanville, Texas teacher at the link went too far. Her words look pretty stupid. But I also think she ought to have a right to say such things without being fired. The problem is saying them in public. So fired she is and all because of a Tweet. Not for me, thanks. Not for me.

Via Instapundit.

Barry’s Temper Tantrum

I understand his mea culpa over the Republican wave was a doozy. No mea culpa, actually. Of course not. Megalomanical. Narcissistic. Childish. All the usual Wormtongue encomiums. I don’t think he called anyone chickenshit, though.

But I can’t say for sure. I didn’t watch it nor will I read it. I can’t stand the sight of the man, his voice or his lies. Play golf for your last two years, Barry, take the Mooch on expensive vacations. Sign a garbage-bag-full of executive orders. Whatever. I just want to live long enough to see you retire.

Via Instapundit.

UPDATE:  Listening is not his strong suit. Or negotiation. Or telling the truth. Meanwhile, his lapdog news media, no doubt fearing having to do some real work, i.e. reporting, with the Republicans in power, are urging him to double-down.

Abolish the FEC

It is, as law professor and Instapundit Glenn Reynolds says, clearly unconstitutional. This regulating of elections, specifically who can donate money to whom and how much. Especially by a partisan agency run by partisans.

The FEC with Weintraub on board has shown zero interest in investigating the foreign money that the 2008 and 2012 Obama campaigns are known to have accepted, which is against campaign finance law.”

Just one of the many laws Wormtongue has broken, backed by his federal Democrat bureaucrats, such as the FEC, IRS, and, lest we forget, Fart, Barf & Itch.

Via PJMedia.

Panic Over Obola Not Ebola

SEE UPDATE BELOW: New Ebola case in New York City.

It’s our lying, incompetent louse of a president that has people fearful of Ebola. Because we know he and his bumbling, biased bureaucrats will do nothing about it expect lie and prevaricate. Or as Mark Bayless, a commenter at the Wall Street Journal put it:

“The problem is….a complete collapse in our tolerance for self serving governmental bureaucrats, starting with Obama.  His kids do not attend the wretched public schools he forces on the rest of us and they do not eat the gruel that his brain dead wife demands that our kids eat. His family is not subject to ObamaCare and will be protected, at great expense if necessary, from the threat of Ebola.  We have had enough of this double standard.”

And WSJ commenter Judy Smith: “What we’re afraid of is HIM.”

Via WSJ.

UPDATE: And with very good reason, Judy. We have a newly discovered ebola patient in NYC, a doctor who should have known better after returning from West Africa. Instead, he rode the subway and went bowling in Brooklyn before he came down with 103 temperature. Now his girlfriend is quarantined and our brilliant federal health officials are canvassing his neighborhood for more victims. May it stay in the Northeast, thank you very much.

MORE:  New Yorkers are understandably upset and fearful—especially considering they are governed by Obola’s own party. Which is busy covering its ass before the elections. And backing-and-filling.

Vote fraud efficiency

In Cook County, Illinois, i.e. Chicago, voter fraud is down to a science. When you vote Republican, the voting software automatically switches your vote to the Democrat. Now why couldn’t they get those Obamacare web sites to work, eh?

Via Instapundit.

Things women won’t admit

Disclosure by the Instapundit: “…the joys of cleaning public restrooms. I had a job where I had to do that in high school. It was indeed education, especially the women’s room, which was always worse.”

No surprise here.

Why we should be afraid of the police

“The buzz phrase in policing today is officer safety. You’ll also hear lots of references to preserving order, and fighting wars, be it on crime, drugs, or terrorism. Those are all concepts that emphasize confrontation. It’s a view that pits the officers as the enforcer, and the public as the entity upon which laws and policies and procedures are to be enforced.”

Thus Miriam Carey died under a hail of bullets from men who should have been ashamed when they found out she wasn’t armed.

Wonders the Cato Instititue’s Walter Olson: “Why would cops wear camouflage gear against a terrain patterned by convenience stores and beauty parlors?” To paraphrase Glenn Reynolds, the Instapundit, when you dress like a combat soldier you think and act like you’re in a war.

So thugs like Michael Brown and Trayvon Martin have learned to attack the trigger-happy cops first. The rest of us? We’re reduced to trying “to be careful out there” whenever a cop is around.

“—Individual cops may feel threatened— and may be threatened in the course of doing their jobs — but they still do not have the right to use more force than is necessary. Too often, panicked or angry cops pump multiple rounds into already-wounded suspects, as appears to have happened to Michael Brown.”

If Officer Friendly considers us an enemy to be vanquished, he’s a bomb ready to explode.

Via Instapundit.