Tag Archives: Sarah

Leftist misogyny

Amazing what Sarah can bring out in the Leftists: their essential sexism, otherwise hidden. The progs just can’t discuss/mock women politicos without  sexual references. It’s quite beyond them, despite all their progressive trappings.

Via Instapundit.

UPDATE:  And their stupidity. “Hi, Mom!”

Why not OJT for Sarah?

On The Job training was good enough for Barry. Why not for Sarah? Even the few Legacy Media writers who claim to sympathize with her over the stupendous scorn she endures from their peers feel obligated to add that she needs something more to be taken seriously.

Huh? Wasn’t necessary for Barry. He was never governor of anything for any length of time. All he ever did was vote present, push unrestricted abortion and otherwise flip-flop with the wind. Only other difference I can see is that he’s a male and he’s black.

UPDATE:  Here’s an excellant description of why the Democrats and their client media (and some Republicans as well, particularly the RINOS) are so upset about her. Note the dirty-trickster trying to get in with the "Homos for Palin" tee shirt. If he had been gay, the shirt would have said "Gays for Palin," not "Homos," which is obviously meant to be perjorative. Looks like she’s running to me, too.

The crooked media

My former colleagues in the MSM, at least the ones who still have jobs, have no shame. Their pretense of "objectivity" in reporting is so far from reality that even their defenders can no longer ignore it. They have been bought and paid for by the Democrat party and exist only to please Barry–the most secretive candidate since Nixon. So they drill into each facet of Sarah’s life, while ignoring Barry’s pathetic, aging fratboy Joey Hairplugs. All the President’s Men, this ain’t. If it ever was.

UPDATE: Indeed, Big Media’s attacks on Sarah are the best evidence that there is no standard of objectivity in American journalism–despite the journalism degree now required to get a job in it.

Barry’s intentions

In the verbal rugby at my OCS email group over why we should/should not vote for Barry, his champions have turned to CAPITAL LETTERS to express their indignation that the establishment media is wasting time over Barry’s "allegedly" calling Sarah a pig, when it should be discussing "the issues." Good Dems always get exercised when the MSM steps (oh, so, momentarily) outside its habit of criticizing Republicans to criticize one of their nobles. It certainly is one of the few, if not the only times, the sycophantic media has questioned His Holiness.

I side with Treacher on this one. Barry certainly did mean to call Sarah a pig, and his audience certainly picked it up that way. Just as he meant to give Hillary the finger back in the spring when she dared to criticize him in a debate. He folds under pressure. Not a good sign for a wouldbe president. Moreover, after twenty years in the pews of his racist Chicago church, Barry’d probably like to whack Whitey a lot more than he has. But he knows that he can’t do that and get elected. So he allows himself to wallow in the safer mud of sexism. As for "the issues," that’s the standard Dem dodge, only trotted out when they seem to be in danger of losing. As, indeed, they certainly are. Surprise, surprise.