Tag Archives: Sarah Palin

Going Rogue: An American Life

I’m only about half through it, but this is a wonderful book. Full of good humor and understanding of people and politics, from the small town where everyone knows your business to the national arena where they think they do. The criticism is measured and often funny. There’s none of the whining and get-even, that I can see, that’s been reported so often in the legacy media.

If Sarah wrote all of it, she’s a helluva writer. If she had help, she apparently didn’t need much. The "voice" is consistent and assured throughout.

It is a political book, of course, and as self-serving as Barry’s Dreams From My Father. Although his book is more about race and grievance and her’s rarely touches on either subject and then only in connection with her husband’s Eskimo heritage. So there’s evident calculation in these pages, but that’s not surprising. Whether she ever runs for president or anything else, she wants us to like her. And I think any reader without an ax to grind will like the person Sarah reveals. Unless you’re already convinced that you hate her, you should get a copy. It’s worth the read.

Sarah: Kill the bill

Sarah Palin, using her Facebook account as a periodic press release, is fighting tonight’s Dem vote on health care "reform":

"While this Saturday night vote might seem like a procedural matter, at the end of the day a vote against Senator Reid’s motion is a vote against massive new government spending and a take-over of 1/6th of the U.S. economy; it’s a vote against billions in tax increases and penalties; it’s a vote against federal funding of abortion; and it’s a vote against ignoring responsible tort reform."

Sarah, whose education and experience are so assiduously disputed by her Dem and old media detractors, can count the dean of Harvard Medical School in her corner on this one:

"…it’s entirely unclear how such unspecified changes would impact physician practices and compensation, hospital organizations and their capacity to invest, and the ability of patients to receive the kind and quality of care they desire. Similar challenges would eventually confront the entire country on a more explosive scale if the current legislation becomes law."

Course even if tonight’s vote to move the bill to the floor succeeds, it and the House version are different and must be reworked into one by a conference committee. Only then can two final votes occur, one in the House, the other in the Senate. So tonight is only the beginning of the game. And even if the bill were eventually to be voted down, we can assume the Dem leadership would come up with another one and try again. With Barry’s approval rating already in free-fall, they have to be worried about losing their majority in 2010.

UPDATE:  Reidcare moves on. With a little $300 million help for his friend. But there’s still plenty of time to kill this turkey.

If Sarah wasn’t so darn pretty…

Bloggers Ann Althouse and Michelle Goldberg argue cogently (well, Ann does) for almost an hour on Bloggingheads and come to three conclusions:

1) We’re all talking about Sarah Palin and her book only because she’s so darn pretty (if she was plain or even ugly, McCain never would have elevated her to national consciousness), 2) cBS talking head Katie Couric should post the unedited transcripts of her interviews with Sarah, and 3) Sarah is a screen onto which some conservatives can project hope just as Barry was a screen onto which some liberals could project hope.

I have to admit they pretty well work for me, as well. And I’d leave a comment to that effect at Althouse’s blog if the stupid Google comment system didn’t demand that I verify a word that doesn’t even exist! Morons.

Although it should be considered that the "pretty" conclusion doesn’t explain why so many of Sarah’s fans are women. Including moms with strollers. Does it?

Why not OJT for Sarah?

On The Job training was good enough for Barry. Why not for Sarah? Even the few Legacy Media writers who claim to sympathize with her over the stupendous scorn she endures from their peers feel obligated to add that she needs something more to be taken seriously.

Huh? Wasn’t necessary for Barry. He was never governor of anything for any length of time. All he ever did was vote present, push unrestricted abortion and otherwise flip-flop with the wind. Only other difference I can see is that he’s a male and he’s black.

UPDATE:  Here’s an excellant description of why the Democrats and their client media (and some Republicans as well, particularly the RINOS) are so upset about her. Note the dirty-trickster trying to get in with the "Homos for Palin" tee shirt. If he had been gay, the shirt would have said "Gays for Palin," not "Homos," which is obviously meant to be perjorative. Looks like she’s running to me, too.

Hatin’ on Sarah: Amazon’s Troll Reviewers

I suppose it was inevitable that even the "five-star" Amazon reviews of Sarah’s new book would be hateful. And full of regurgitated legacy media lies. The lead off one tonight is by "Gen. JC Christian, patriot," all of whose Amazon "reviews" of various conservative books are really beatdowns that tell you nothing about the book because the odds are that JC hasn’t opened it.

To guarantee that JC’s opus stays on top, people who agree with him/her click to say it was "helpful." So far he has 751 helpfuls out of 1,200 clicks. Many of the other first eighteen "reviews" are, like JC, mocking and anonymous. Who’d want to put their real name on such swill? Well, some do. Even trolls want their fifteen minutes of fame. Being, apparently, too cheap or lazy to get a blog.

Amazon can’t, apparently, stop people like JC & friends from gaming the system for their political hobby horses. They have, wisely, instituted a tag for a reviewer to click on that shows whether one has actually bought the book being reviewed. Their own computer system can verify it, I presume. It helps the neutral shopper decide whether a review really is a review. Neither JC’s effort, nor any of the other seventeen have the tag.

The genius of the New York Times

NYT1924.jpg

Reading of (not actually reading, I have better things to do) the NYTimes’ latest sneer at Sarah Palin reminded me of the above bit of their journalistic genius. What prognosticators they were and are! They condemn her lack of experience while they puffed Barry, the candidate with even less experience, and she was only running for vice president. Ah, but, you see, he was in the right party and he went to the right school.

The gang-on continues, with AP devoting eleven reporters to what Sarah said in her new book (which I ordered and expect to have this week). As she notes, eleven reporters could do a lot of important work, but… Naw, too hard.

Via Snoop at Simply Jews, who knows a crystal ball when he sees one. Heh.

Little Bits

* Back when I used to eat sugar with abandon, Necco wafers were my favorites. Just as well I can’t eat them anymore. They’ve turned organic, flavored by such as red beet juice. Sounds dreadful.

* Dick Cheney is backing Kay Bailey Hutchinson for governor. Lordy. While Sarah plumps for Rick Perry. This could be a dustup. What is it about Republicans? Why do they so often choose suicide?

* This weekend I expect to be eating leftover, stale candy corn. A little, anyhow. Might as try a Necco.

* Mr. B., upon learning that his cub scout pack will be picking up trash after his school’s Halloween carnival on Saturday: "That’s the thing about the scouts. There’s the good parts and the bad parts."

* Happy to see this old photo I snatched years ago still draws ’em in. A score or more hits a day, in fact.