Category Archives: Scribbles

Ike hype

It doesn’t say much for education when the Austin public school system joins in hyping a hurricane hundreds of miles away from its forecast path. They’re letting Mr. B. and his chums out three hours early today.

He called me this morning from a teacher-telephone station on the playground, sounding worried, as of course he would be since he’s in the midst of group-think and not likely getting the local forecast for clear skies this afternoon and only normally-gusty winds tonight with just a forty percent chance of rain. What nonsense. There is some, but only just, concern that the wobbly storm may track farther west than the now-forecast radical curve northeast through East Texas, which would miss us entirely. It’s a wide storm, true enough, but the west side of it, where we’ll be, isn’t likely to carry much wind or rain this far inland.

MORE: Not saying there’s no danger, just that it’s not likely here. Coastal Texas already is seeing flooding with a big storm surge expected to seriously threaten life and property in the Galveston-Houston area. Could be Indianola, 1886, all over again down there. JD, at Mouth of the Brazos, already has fled. Check out this KHOU Houston aerial video of Galveston taken about 4 p.m. Friday showing waves routinely topping the seawall. That can only get worse as Ike crosses the coast.

Mr. Infanticide

Barry could be criticized for many examples of poor judgement, such as his racist, radical and terrorist associates. But one thing stands out above all the others.

Instead of smearing Sarah for her anti-abortion stand–which she has never made a part of her politics–Barry’s cheerleaders should grill him on the most obnoxious vote of his days in the Illinois legislature: to deny children who survive abortions basic medical care.

MORE: Instead, the WaPo frontpages another, old story about Cindy McCain’s onetime drug problems, and joins the propagandists at ABC in whacking Sarah over another misquote, this time a remark on Iraq. Clearly, they have no shame when it comes to trying to elect Barry.

The establishment media bites

Sarah handled herself well in the so-called interview with ABC’s Charlie Gibson, whose body language betrayed his skepticism and therefore his lack of objectivity throughout. Some journalist. Worse was when he called one of her answers "a blur blizzard of words." She should have stomped him. I would have. Worst was the video cutting of her comments to get what he wanted. It was so rough that her image jumped around. What a bozo, as usual in this overpaid child’s game, playing to his buddies in the establishment media instead of helpfully bringing out a major political candidate’s personality and character for the benefit of the nation.

The notion, which he kept repeating, that she, or any vice president has to have traveled extensively and met world leaders and be intimate with foreign policy, is laughable. Nothing about that in the Constitution, Chaz. Even, in her case, borderline sexism. It closes the door on all but the poobahs of the Beltway, the intimate friends of media players like Gibson and his pals. What had Truman, for instance, the former Missouri county judge who never attended college, done before he met Joe Stalin? What, for that matter, did blow-dry trial lawyer John Edwards know when he ran with Kerry? What does Barry know now, and he wants to be president?

But in the end, Sarah handled herself with poise and patience, as if she were talking to a well-dressed chimpanzee. Which, despite the glitzy showbiz of teevee news, is pretty close to the truth. Now, we’ll expect Gibson’s jungle buddies, and the Lefty blogosphere, to pounce and wail about this awful, shallow woman, and be surprised if they don’t. Not that it will make a drop of difference to most American voters who tuned out these self-important clowns long ago.

MORE:  Then, after misquoting her invoking stating that God’s blessing God had blessed the Iraq campaign (obviously to make her look like a dangerous religious nut) and being corrected by a bunch of folks, ABC goes back and edits out the misquote to make their trained ape look good. No correction issued of course. That’s showbiz, folks. That ain’t journalism. Fortunately, the original, with the misquote, her denial, and Gibson’s pontifical insistence that it is perfectly correct, is still on YouTube here. What a shabby crew. And–surprise,surprise, more coverup from the WaPo. Chuckle. It’s inept, too.

Community organizer or bagman?

NY’s governor says when Sarah says ‘community organizer’ it’s a racist code word for ‘black.’ Whoa. Now that’s truly strange. I always heard that, in Chicago, anyhow, it was a code word for ‘bagman.’

Barry’s intentions

In the verbal rugby at my OCS email group over why we should/should not vote for Barry, his champions have turned to CAPITAL LETTERS to express their indignation that the establishment media is wasting time over Barry’s "allegedly" calling Sarah a pig, when it should be discussing "the issues." Good Dems always get exercised when the MSM steps (oh, so, momentarily) outside its habit of criticizing Republicans to criticize one of their nobles. It certainly is one of the few, if not the only times, the sycophantic media has questioned His Holiness.

I side with Treacher on this one. Barry certainly did mean to call Sarah a pig, and his audience certainly picked it up that way. Just as he meant to give Hillary the finger back in the spring when she dared to criticize him in a debate. He folds under pressure. Not a good sign for a wouldbe president. Moreover, after twenty years in the pews of his racist Chicago church, Barry’d probably like to whack Whitey a lot more than he has. But he knows that he can’t do that and get elected. So he allows himself to wallow in the safer mud of sexism. As for "the issues," that’s the standard Dem dodge, only trotted out when they seem to be in danger of losing. As, indeed, they certainly are. Surprise, surprise.

You mean they weren’t already doing this?

Florida, it seems, will finally require people registering to vote to prove their identity with a valid state or federal I.D. Seems the law is "controversial." Wow. This is very old news in Texas, where you also have to show an I.D., preferably your driver’s license, before you can actually vote. If a state didn’t require this, how else would they know who the voter was?

Mac’s decision proving decisive

It’s official, Barry-sized crowds are now greeting Mac and Sarah wherever they campaign. The establishment media’s reporting of it is snarky, as expected, asking if Mac will get angry because they’re coming to see Sarah instead of him. My guess is he would laugh at the suggestion. Afterall, she wouldn’t be there but for him.

Indeed, I keep remembering two lines from his convention speech, the speech that was supposed to be so forgettable. I don’t remember anything from hers, except her shining, cheerful face. Brent, a commenter at Althouse reminded me of them again today: 1) "…and they broke me…" the first admission of frailty that I ever heard an American politician make at a political convention. Very moving. And 2) "…and serve a cause greater than yourself…" an echo of JFK’s "Ask not…" line.

On second thought Brent reminds me that there is something that I recall from Sarah’s effort, a line she is now repeating on the stump: "There’s only one man in this election who has ever really fought for you."

Yep, a wily old sailor who knows when to give ’em a broadside and board ’em in the smoke.