Category Archives: South of the Border

TEXAS: A Historical Atlas

What a book. The colorful new atlas, which aims to supplant a popular one published in 1990 by the same author, A. Ray Stephens, seems to have it all. It’s even prettier.

Step back a few decades, and you see the strengths in its graphical presentations, the data usually sorted by counties. The dwindling of farms, from their peak in 1900 to the present’s paucity. The dramatic rise in urban populations and extension of the railroads–including a photo of a train crossing the dramatic Pecos High Bridge, built in 1882. Major aquifers, native-plant regions, and location of the worst tornadoes. Go back farther and, well, how about the distribution of slaves in 1850 and again in 1861? A lot fewer than you might think.

There are weaknesses. The modern distribution of cattle, of all things, notably does not include (the fact is noted but the reason left unstated), the numbers of cows in the miles-long industrial feedlots of the Panhandle.

As Mrs. C. says: “Coffee-table books are supposed to be pretty and not controversial.” By that measure it’s not surprising that it’s less informative the closer it gets to its publication date. For one, illegal immigration from Mexico (the politically-correct phrase “undocumented workers” is used) is dismissed as merely “producing much rhetoric.” A few hundred thousand people a year swamping schools, emergency rooms and charities and increasing the danger on highways is more than rhetoric.

No, most of the strengths are in the past, with special maps and diagrams for Mexican Texas, the early explorers from 1519, the grants of the empresarios and major early roads, the Texas Revolution. The modern section is eclectic: mapping nuclear and coal-fired power plants, the lumber industry, distribution of major crops, colleges and universities, and ethnic and racial groups by county.

All-in-all, and despite the faults,  an invaluable reference work of which I was pleased to receive a review copy. One only wonders why it’s published by the University of Oklahoma Press.

US Atty Gen: opposes law he hasn’t read

Poe: So Arizona, since the federal government fails to secure the border, desperately passed laws to protect its own people. The law is supported by 70% of the people in Arizona, 60% of all Americans and [27]% of all Hispanics, according to the Wall Street Journal/NBC poll done just this week. And I understand that you may file a lawsuit against the law. It seems to me the administration ought to be enforcing border security and immigration laws and not challenge them and that the administration is on the wrong side of the American people. Have you read the Arizona law?

Holder: I have not had a chance to—I’ve glanced at it. I have not read it.

Poe: It’s 10 pages. It’s a lot shorter than the health care bill, which was 2,000 pages long. I’ll give you my copy of it, if you would like to—to have a copy.

Can anybody in Obamalot play this game? Read it all here.

Calderon: Protect our safety valve

Mexican President Calderon is upset with Arizona for refusing to be Old Mexico’s political safety valve and continue accepting illegal immigrants. Why, if this refusal catches on Mexico’s oligarchy might have to stave off revolution by actually creating new jobs for its own people.

Which would cut into the economic status quo enjoyed by Calderon and his cronies. So much easier to encourage poor Mexicans to go north and work for the gringos. And wax indignant at any threat to the goverment’s favored practice, i.e. screw the gringos. And, of course, his fellow Mexicans.

Arizona law matches federal one

Bob Phillips, an OC-504 comrade who served as a San Diego assistant district attorney for many years says the allegedly-racist Arizona anti-illegal immigration law isn’t new:

“…at least as I understand it, doesn’t change the existing law at all, except maybe to encourage Arizona cops to be more proactive in doing what the Border Patrol is too understaffed to do effectively by themselves.

“When I was a cop way back in the 70’s, we used to stop and arrest illegal aliens all the time. A state cop (under the case law) is empowered to enforce federal statutes so long as it was Congress’s intent that they do so when the statute was enacted. There is case law that says that Congress intended local cops to enforce the federal illegal entry and illegal presence statutes. So we did so until it became politically incorrect to do so.

“So San Diego PD, and many other agencies, by policy, quit enforcing the federal statutes. Arizona did no more than eliminate the issue (if there ever was one) by making it a violation of state law as well to be in the country illegally. Being a victim of the illegal alien invasion myself at times, I’m all for it.”

Me, too, tired as I am of seeing my taxes rise to pay for the consequences of the invasion that our feckless politicians and president wish to ignore.

Pemex oil spill was worse

The Gulf oil spill, which British Petroleum is now trying to cap, so to speak, at the wellhead five thousand feet below the surface with a steel and concrete box, is puny compared to a Pemex one back in the early 80s 1979. That sucker was spewing even more oil than BP’s until it finally was plugged up. It involved a Dallas company owned by our then-Gov. Bill Clements who was leasing equipment to Pemex, the Mexican national oil company.

The Pemex blowout’s saving grace, as I recall, was that it was scores of miles south of the Texas coast, somewhere in the Bay of Campeche. BP’s is less dramatic but more worrisome because it is relatively close to the mouth of the Mississippi River. Hence whatever oil does not sink to the bottom or get volatilized in the warm air and water will soil the beaches and fishing grounds of four states.

Though I expect the Mexicans are still trying to get the tar balls off their own beaches south of Matamoros. Pemex, long a power in Mexican politics, is far less environmental- or social-minded than BP. You just seldom read about it. Our news media rarely penetrates that far south, and Pemex and the Mexican government would not cooperate if they did.

UPDATE:  Houston Chronicle claims some of it got as far north as the beaches at Port A. Not much, apparently, as they credit “heavy rains” with washing most of it away.

This is not Mexican Independence Day?

Nope. That’s September 16. Cinco de Mayo is both simpler and more complicated, being at root a commemoration of a Mexican peasant army’s 1862 defeat of an invading contingent of the French Foreign Legion. Nowadays, it’s more of a family celebration among Mexican-Americans, with only a look-back at the old country, where it’s hardly observed at all.

One of the best explanations of the history of it that I’ve seen is by Austinite Don Miles. His 296-page non-fiction Indie book, Cinco de Mayo: What Is Everyone Celebrating, is a fascinating adventure story involving a pathetic Austrian royalist and his nervous wife, poorly-armed Mexican revolutionaries, some die-hard Confederates, Unconditional Surrender Grant, and much more. You really should get the book. (A used copy goes for just $2.84 plus S&H) Too bad it’s not an e-book. At least, if it is, I can’t find a copy.

The “papers, please” canard

Blogger John Salmon and I are continuing our argument (when he’s not trying to change the subject to the “awful” Mexican War) about his favoring leaving the Southern border open and amnesty for all comers and, by-the-by, calling me and others who disagree with him racists.

One of his arguments against the new Arizona immigration law is the standard legacy media lie that, under its provisions, cops (presumably white fascists) will start pulling over every Hispanic Mexican-looking driver and demanding their papers proving their right to be in the country. Sounds likely to John and his fellow Northeasterners, who see precious few Hispanics Mexicans.

The flaw in the argument (which also has been made by none other than our feckless president) is the large size of the Hispanic Mexican population here in Texas (one-third of us) and the other border states. Not to mention the crucial fact that many of our cops are, themselves, Hispanics Mexican-Americans.

So no cop in Arizona or anywhere else in a border state is going to start picking on Hispanics Mexicans about their citizenship unless they are already suspected of violating the law. Otherwise, there’d be no time for said cops to do anything else but stop them, there are so many of them. You see what I’m saying?