Category Archives: The War

The 9/11 generation

Armyrecruiting.jpg

The patriots keep on coming. The Code Pink crowd might shuffle them around, from Iraq to Afghanistan or wherever, might even bring a bunch of them home, if Barry wins the presidency. But there won’t be any question of running out of them, or stressing them to the breaking point, etc.

Via Sense of Events 

Barry’s general

Obama may not know much about ground troops, but he’s got part of the wild blue yonder covered. Retired Gen. Merrill McPeak, a former Air Force chief of staff, is a key supporter of the candidate he praises for "real gravitas." McPeak is still a bit of a loose aerial cannon, a role he established in the first Gulf War when he stepped on some toes by declaring the campaign the first time air power had defeated a field army. But his presence in Barry’s camp shows the junior Illinois senator isn’t a total neophyte when it comes to military affairs–despite the fears of other general officers, some Air Force ones included.

UPDATE:  Protein Wisdom has a profile of McPeak which suggests Barry is securely in the surrender-in-Iraq camp, and not just lying to the lefties, like he’s lying to the rust belt on NAFTA.

Tapper taps out

Some journalist. Mr. T. finds the army captain who was Obama’s source for his inaccurate statements last night in Austin about the army in Afghanistan. Then, other than merely noting that the captain backs up Barry (why wouldn’t he, he was the source) Tapper doesn’t question his assertions or bother to get a second source to verify them, or even overtly notice that they contradict Obama’s public remarks. Wonder how much ABC pays for lazy work like this. Ace also takes him to task.

Barry’s blunder

Not that it matters, at least here in the San Francisco of Texas, which is pretty well set as Obama Country for the Texas Dem primary, judging by the bumper stickers and yard signs. But Barry’s claim at last night’s Dem/MSM dog-and-pony-show (laughingly called "a debate") that our troops in Afghanistan are so desperate that they must capture their weapons from the Taliban is wacko.

From the CNN transcript: "You know, I’ve heard from an Army captain who was the head of a rifle platoon — supposed to have 39 men in a rifle platoon. Ended up being sent to Afghanistan with 24 because 15 of those soldiers had been sent to Iraq. And as a consequence, they didn’t have enough ammunition, they didn’t have enough humvees. They were actually capturing Taliban weapons, because it was easier to get Taliban weapons than it was for them to get properly equipped by our current commander in chief."

First of all, captains lead companies, not platoons. And for various reasons that would be obvious to anyone with minimal knowledge of our NATO vs the Taliban’s Russian weaponry–which apparently does not include Barry–nothing they have would be useful to us and vice versa. Different rifles. Different rifle ammo. Different shells. &c. So now we see that the Dems’ prospective Pacifist-in-Chief is a bigger boob than anyone thought. Or else his wife (she of the finally-proud-to-be-an-American remark) isn’t the only one affected by self-righteousness and the blunders it breeds.

UPDATE: Heh. And Barry’s claim flew right over Hilarity’s head, as Wretchard points out. These Dems labor in amazing ignorance sometimes.

MORE:  ABC News’ Jake Tapper interviews the captain Obama quoted, though does not name him or feel the need to question or corroborate his details, and shows (though Tapper doesn’t say so) that Barry (to be charitable about it) garbled the officer’s message. For one thing, the captain didn’t say fifteen of his men went to Iraq, or that they lacked ammunition in Afghanistan, or raise the crucial Obama detail that they needed captured weapons–only that they had used some of them from time to time. Obama also didn’t mention that this information was five years old, occurring in 2003. So, while Tapper concludes that we bloggers have gone off half-cocked, I still think it’s a shoddy political performance, and close to an outright lie.

Bullseye

Funny how exercised the Chinese communists (who did it in secrecy), ex-communist Russians (who’ve never done it at all) and the usual assortment of American critics (who can’t do a day without whining about something) get over a little out-of-this-world target practice. The Navy’s hitting the satellite on the first try, when it was 150 miles high, looked like nice work from here. With the side benefit of warning Iran, Syria, North Korea, etc., that their nuclear missiles won’t be immune.

The eight-year-old scandal

So what is the NYTimes up to? Bashing McCain for something that happened eight years ago, now, before he’s even nominated? Why not wait until, say, October? Could it be they want to give Huckabee a better chance, figuring Barry (or even Hilarity) will have a better chance against the Huckster than McCain? For once I agree with CNN: it seems this is more a story about the NYTimes than it is about McCain.

UPDATE:  The fact that the NYTimes offered NO PROOF for its assertion that McCain actually had an affair with a female lobbyist didn’t stop the Associated Press from picking up the story and expanding it for its clients. In addition to having no accuracy, they obviously have no shame.

No sharia here

Mowithbomb.jpg

Mr. Westergaard and wife are in hiding, threatened with death for his drawing of this cartoon. Which gives me the chance for a little solidarity with free speech. I recall even the liberal daily printed this one, the least offensive of the bunch, it seems to me. And quite benign compared to the anti-Jew cartoons that regularly appear in Arab newspapers and magazines. So hang in there, Kurt.